Governor to consider Sanjay Dutt pardon

TheRager thumbnail
Anniversary 20 Thumbnail Group Promotion 8 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#1

Governor will consider appeal if Sanjay Dutt requests: Law Minister

Edited by Mala Das (with inputs from PTI) | Updated: March 22, 2013 17:59 IST


Governor will consider appeal if Sanjay Dutt requests: Law Minister
New Delhi: With Press Council of India (PCI) chief Justice Markandey Katju asking the Maharashtra Governor to pardon film star Sanjay Dutt in a case related to the 1993 Mumbai blasts, the government today indicated that the matter will be looked into and an "appropriate" decision taken once such a plea is made by the actor.

"Governor will use his discretionary power when there will be an appeal to him. He has the power to pardon. We should not comment on it," Law Minister Ashwani Kumar said.

Information and Broadcasting Minister Manish Tewari said the authorities will take cognisance of the matter at the appropriate level.

"Justice Katju has been a very eminent judge of the Supreme Court. Whenever he articulates a position on an issue, people both inside and outside the government listen to it carefully," Mr Tewari told reporters outside Parliament.

"But there are various aspects to the issue and I am sure that those people within the government, whether at the state government or level of various other instrumentalities of government, who are seized with the responsibility of dealing with the issue, take cognizance of the statement and then, if required, formulate an appropriate response and then come back," he said.

In a letter to Maharashtra Governor K Sankarnarayanan, Justice Katju sought pardon for Mr Dutt, whose five-year sentence was upheld by the Supreme Court in an arms case related to the 1993 Bombay blasts.

Mr Katju sought pardon for Mr Dutt under Article 161 of the Constitution, saying the actor had not been found guilty of playing a role in the serial blasts and had suffered a lot.

Pardon Sanjay Dutt clamour grows even as many oppose leniency

India, Posted on Mar 22, 2013 at 10:23pm IST

New Delhi: A day after Sanjay Dutt was awarded a jail term of five years in the 1993 Mumbai blasts case by the Supreme Court, the clamour for his sentence to be commuted has grown louder even as others have said that his conviction has been upheld by the highest court of the country and there should be no leniency towards him. Chairman of Press Council of India Justice Markandey Katju said Dutt should be pardoned and that he will meet the Maharashtra Chief Minister on the issue. Speaking to CNN-IBN, Justice Katju said, "I am not questioning the Supreme Court verdict. I have sent an appeal to the Governor requesting him to pardon Sanjay Dutt and I have said this on humanitarian reasons."

Dutt has also found support in others too including several political leaders. Samajwadi Party Rajya Sabha MP Jaya Bachchan said that she will appeal to have Dutt's sentence commuted while another party leader Naresh Agarwal said that the government should commute his sentence.

SP leader Ramgopal Yadav said, "Here no arms were recovered. Sanjay Dutt is in this position because of his lawyer. He should not have been convicted. There is no evidence. The punishment given is too harsh."

The Supreme Court found Sanjay Dutt guilty of acquiring illegal weapons from those blamed for 1993 Mumbai serial bombings.

Katju's views were also supported by the NCP, a UPA constituent. NCP leader DP Tripathi said, "Even the Supreme Court found Sanjay Dutt not guilty of terrorist activities. I feel that the Maharashtra government should pardon Dutt and give him a reprieve. Justice Markanday Katju is right in his demand."

Several Union ministers also backed the idea of commuting Dutt's prison term. Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Rajiv Shukla said that his sympathy is with Dutt and his family. "He has already suffered a lot but ultimately this decision can only be made by the judiciary," said Shukla.

Union Minister Manish Tewari said, "I'm sure that those people within the government who are seized with the responsibility, would take that statement into cognizance and formulate an appropriate response and get back to you."

However, voices against showing any leniency to the convicted criminal are also growing. BJP leader Meenakshi Lekhi and Janata Party supremo Subramanian Swamy are against pardoning Dutt in the 1993 Mumbai blasts case.

"I'm surprised at the people who are making these comments because pardon happens in those cases where the punishment is death sentence. And in a case where the person has been caught with arms has been found to be guilty of such a terror attack, I think it is high time. Only one person has been given death penalty and I think a little more stiffer stand on this is required," said Lekhi.

Subramanian Swamy said Dutt shouldn't be treated differently and that he will challenge anyone who seeks a pardon for Dutt. "I will challenge the court if they try to rethink over the issue. Even he is not saying that he have got an unfair judgment. The person who gave the judgment he is soon going to be the Chief Justice of India. Then how can someone say he is not eminent enough to decide."

Senior lawyer and MP Ram Jethmalani, too, is against any leniency towards Dutt. "Actually, Dutt has been treated very lightly by the other court. That he was let off on a very serious charge. That is his great achievement," said Jethmalani.

The film fraternity has also come out in force and have been claiming that Dutt has already suffered too much and thus should be let off. Jaya Bachchan and Cheeranjivi have said that they will personally appeal to the Governor for Dutt. "What the Supreme Court has given is the final verdict. But as a friend of Sanjay Dutt he should get the mercy. If he gets the mercy, I will be the happiest person. I wish him all the best," said Chiranjeevi.

However, Special Public Prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam does not share the view. He said, "Do you think it is right for someone accused in a case for illegal possession of arms to ask for pardon? Is it acceptable to ask for pardon for such a conviction?"

The immediate course available for Dutt is to file a review petition in the Supreme Court within four weeks. If the review petition is dismissed or rejected by the court, a curative petition can also be filed. In a curative petition the lawyer will need to present a new fact related to the case not presented before the court earlier. The last option before Dutt will be of reaching out to the Maharashtra Governor who could remit his sentence. But that would depend on the recommendation of the State government.

The apex court found the actor guilty of acquiring illegal weapons from those blamed for the bombings in Mumbai that killed 257 people and was given four weeks to surrender.

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/pardon-sanjay-dutt-clamour-grows-even-as-many-oppose-leniency/380567-3.html

Created

Last reply

Replies

16

Views

1.7k

Users

12

Likes

44

Frequent Posters

Dar_Fitte_Moo thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail Anniversary 14 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
for once when my belief in the Indian judiciary was about to reinstate this pathetic leeching BW screwed
khoslakadhokla thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#3
F*ck It!

You give one moment of belief and then the next moment snatch it away like it never happened...ughh!
TheRager thumbnail
Anniversary 20 Thumbnail Group Promotion 8 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#4
I wonder then why they even wasted all the public resources to get a conviction for Sanjay Dutt? They could have let him off at the start itself since he was anyways a great guy. I really feel bad for the law enforcing agencies who worked hard to build a case against him and fought for 20 years to see it though. Is it any surprise that the Indian police is so demoralized?
gilmores thumbnail
Anniversary 19 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 11 years ago
#5
Now I'm pretty sure he will be in jail for a few days...max one month before he's pardoned. 🤢
blue-ice. thumbnail
Anniversary 15 Thumbnail Group Promotion 8 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#6
Very Good👏
India is shiningClap
Edited by blue-ice - 11 years ago
MR.KooL thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 8 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#7
Where the hell is Judiciary then.. Really this is Great Indian Drama. He should go to jail and serve the sentence.
gilmores thumbnail
Anniversary 19 Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 11 years ago
#8

'Pardon won't be easy for Sanjay Dutt'

Shibu Thomas, TNN | Mar 23, 2013, 04.09 AM IST
Share More
A
A
READ MORE Sanjay Dutt|D Sankarnarayanan|1993 Blasts Case

MUMBAI: Even as political clamour picked up to seek pardon forSanjay Dutt in the 1993 Blasts Case, it might not be a cakewalk for the actor. He was sentenced to five years in prison for illegal possession of arms on Thursday.

Dutt's legal team was at work a day after the verdict, discussing options. "We have not yet decided on the future course of action," leading criminal lawyer Satish Maneshinde, who represented the actor in the case, told TOI. Legal sources said they may exhaust all the options available, though talk was veering towards filing an application for pardon before Maharashtra governor D Sankarnarayanan.

A pardon might not automatically lead to release from prison immediately. "Over the years, the Supreme Court has said that the governor's powers can be brought under judicial review on limited grounds,'' said advocate Arfan Sait, who practises in the Bombay high court. Under Article 161 of the Constitution, the governor has the power to "grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence against any law." The only restriction is when a convict is given a death sentence or an accused is court-martialled, that an application for pardon can be made only before the President of India.

In 2000, the Supreme Court intervened in a case where a political worker Siriyans Kumar Jain was pardoned by the Haryana governor soon after he was sentenced to life imprisonment for murdering a rival political activist. "The court would be justified in interfering with an order passed by the governor if the governor is found to have exercised the power himself without being advised by the government, or if the governor transgresses the jurisdiction in exercising the power, or it is established that the governor has passed the order without application of mind, or the order in question is mala fide, or the governor has passed the order on some extraneous consideration," the SC ruled.

Two years ago, in another case from Punjab, the apex court had said that the President or the governor, while exercising the power of pardon, could not encroach into the judicial domain and give a finding on a person's guilt or innocence. "The powers of a court of law in a criminal trial and subsequent appeal right up to this court and that of the President/governor operate in totally different arenas, and the nature of these two powers are also totally different from each other. One should not trench upon the other,'' the apex court cautioned.

TheRager thumbnail
Anniversary 20 Thumbnail Group Promotion 8 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#10

I hope then it goes to the Prez. He will reject it. 😎

Top