Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai 10th Jul 2024 Written Update and EDT - Page 44

Car pe loan liya tha car was important no other explaination for such dumb act

Originally posted by: Pinecone

You do not know the details of why people have been blocked. Its not for difference of opinion but for personal attacks and ganging up to mock. I dont owe anyone any explanation for blocking them. I only replied to you because you quoted my post with your pov inviting further discussion. But if ultimately if you just wanna be part of the gang to mock, I'm happy to oblige you by blocking you as well. 🙄 all the blocking feature does anyway is helps to avoid a direct one on one interaction with people.

You have just made an assumption, which is not true. Firstly, I am talking about my own experience and why certain people blocked me. I personally think it's for difference of opinion because I am not someone who engages in such attacks.

I don't think I asked for an explanation for why people blocked me, I am merely stating I find that action rather immature. If one is not able to respect the other person's opinion, why do they then feel entitled to express theirs?

There is no need to take everything so personally. However, that's your prerogative :)

Originally posted by: pyar-ishk

Yeah I didn't get why she wasn't shouting but running and waving

hand to get attention. DKP could've made a little realistic to have

her shouting and if her sister didn't hear is one thing.

because Dkp clearly wants Ak to be responsible for Ruhi’s mom ka death and Ruhi’s trauma .. simple as that!

Originally posted by: Inaya10

There is a difference between listening to options and being legally advised on those options. Just because the client doesn't like the options, doesn't mean that legally that's best for them. As a lawyer, it's her job to advise them what's reasonable and what's not. But Abhira is clearly not thinking about her client's best interest here.

I didn't deny that Arman is not letting his feelings influence him. I mean that's pretty clear.

Why should MG have any expectations from Abhira after he essentially allowed his granddaughter to pursue an immoral relationship with Armaan even... I am sorry but you can't compare this to sending someone to jail!! If Abhira had settled the matter outside of Court, I don't think Manish would be upset, it's the fact that Abhira unreasonably wants to drag this matter to Court so that Ruhi can be punished. Manish knows that the client wants Ruhi to go to jail, so by pursuing the matter in Court, of course, he is going to think that Abhira wants Ruhi in jail.

Abhira got a case, it happens to be against Ruhi. She will fight it. Not at the expense of being unreasonable and illogical! Also, why are we comparing Abhira with Ruhi? Just because Ruhi is bad that doesn't mean Abhira has to be the same, Abhira is better than that! Otherwise, what's the difference between the two? In any case, if Abhira wants to fight it, why is she crying and upset when Manish is telling her off? I mean she shouldn't care right, it's just a case she wants to fight!

If MG has a problem he can stay quiet and stop interacting with Abhira. What's this nautanki of claiming he saw her as apni etc. Why would he stay quiet? Abhira is literally trying to get Ruhi to be imprisoned, and you want Manish to stay quiet? Particularly, when he thought he had a genuine connection with Abhira and has always thought of her as a kind, caring person.

Itni hi apni hoti toh she'd not be homeless and penniless, starving, getting harrassed by his family members on a daily basis. I am not sure if you watched the episodes, but from my recollection, Manish was not aware of Abhira's homelessness and all the other troubles.

Anyway I can fully relate to Abhiras feelings and insecurities, her reasons to take case are more valid in my mind than Armaans reasons to take Ruhis case - That's fair - it's your opinion. I respect that. I think otherwise, I don't find Abhira's actions valid in Ruhi's case.

Ruhi rammed car and MG expects Abhira to vouch for Ruhi and not take up case . Why?! It's not about taking on the case, it's how Abhira is handling the case, that's the problem. She is letting her emotions take over her sound judgment.

she is only taking matter to court. she has not said she wants Ruhi imprisoned and in jail. She is merely pursuing the legal options that dont involve rafa-dafa'ing the matter with paying money as Goenkas want it to be. Ki paise doh and go scot free without any thing going on her record. if the facts are that she drove rashly and injured this man seriously - then she deserves to get the maximum punishment for it and have this case be registered against her name on her record permanently. And as i said ITV never shows these scenes in detail . We have to assume that Abhira offered all options to her client and her client opted to pursue court case. She cannot force them to settle if they dont want to. tomorrow clients can flip and say they do want settlement and Abhira will have to agree to help them with what they wanna do . Abhira is not trying to get anyone imprisoned, rather she is arguing for a fair court hearing of the matter with maximum punishment being awarded for this situation as per law because her clients have opted for no settlement. The judge will decide what is the punishment to be given here.

MG not being aware of her troubles is because he never saw her as apna. If he genuinely cared for the girl he would care to find out where she is, how she is managing. they know she is an orphan and has barely finished her education and has no stability. so this whole dhong of caring about her but never actually being there for her when she most needs it is just convenience. Its not real care/concern when they dont know if she is dead/alive even. What has MG done for Abhira that she should go above and beyond for him and Ruhi. Rather its perfectly reasonable if she wants to be vindictive after everything Ruhi and Goenkas have done to her but she is too kind to actually do that. tomorrow if she learns that Ruhi is being framed and has not done anything, she will withdraw from the case because she is too idealistic .

she is emotional and feeling insecure but the reason she is fighting this case is not to seek revenge.

If she really wanted revenge she'd have done a lot of things that she hasnt done to call Ruhi out for her immorality and her interference

Originally posted by: Inaya10

You have just made an assumption, which is not true. Firstly, I am talking about my own experience and why certain people blocked me. I personally think it's for difference of opinion because I am not someone who engages in such attacks.

I don't think I asked for an explanation for why people blocked me, I am merely stating I find that action rather immature. If one is not able to respect the other person's opinion, why do they then feel entitled to express theirs?

There is no need to take everything so personally. However, that's your prerogative :)

There is not reason to discuss why you or anyone else are blocked by anyone. its a personal choice to block someone and no explanation is needed and neither is it warranted to crack jokes about it and tag people as "immature" for blocking etc. Blocking doesnt prevent anyone from saying what they want to on the forum. you are still entitled to say what you want to. Blocking is a feature that merely helps avoid direct one to one engagement with a person and thats what people use it for.

Originally posted by: Pinecone

she is only taking matter to court. she has not said she wants Ruhi imprisoned and in jail. She is merely pursuing the legal options that dont involve rafa-dafa'ing the matter with paying money as Goenkas want it to be. Ki paise doh and go scot free without any thing going on her record. if the facts are that she drove rashly and injured this man seriously - then she deserves to get the maximum punishment for it and have this case be registered against her name on her record permanently. And as i said ITV never shows these scenes in detail . We have to assume that Abhira offered all options to her client and her client opted to pursue court case. She cannot force them to settle if they dont want to. tomorrow clients can flip and say they do want settlement and Abhira will have to agree to help them with what they wanna do . Abhira is not trying to get anyone imprisoned, rather she is arguing for a fair court hearing of the matter with maximum punishment being awarded for this situation as per law because her clients have opted for no settlement. The judge will decide what is the punishment to be given here.

MG not being aware of her troubles is because he never saw her as apna. If he genuinely cared for the girl he would care to find out where she is, how she is managing. they know she is an orphan and has barely finished her education and has no stability. so this whole dhong of caring about her but never actually being there for her when she most needs it is just convenience. Its not real care/concern when they dont know if she is dead/alive even. What has MG done for Abhira that she should go above and beyond for him and Ruhi. Rather its perfectly reasonable if she wants to be vindictive after everything Ruhi and Goenkas have done to her but she is too kind to actually do that. tomorrow if she learns that Ruhi is being framed and has not done anything, she will withdraw from the case because she is too idealistic .

she is emotional and feeling insecure but the reason she is fighting this case is not to seek revenge.

If she really wanted revenge she'd have done a lot of things that she hasnt done to call Ruhi out for her immorality and her interference

I mean if we have to assume that Abhira offered all options to her client and her client opted to pursue court case, then similarly we have to assume that Abhira wants Ruhi to be imprisoned because according to her client, they want ruhi to be in jail. The client has already expressed this to Manish and Ruhi, hence why Manish is upset and disappointed with Abhira. Ruhi hasn't done something so severe that she needs to be imprisoned. That's why I think, Abhira is not thinking clearly in this case.

Abhira doesn't have to go above and beyond, but she doesn't have to be vindictive or unreasonable either.

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

Children under the age of 7

A child under the age of 7 cannot be charged with a crime, no matter how serious the crime is.((Section 82, Indian Penal Code, 1860[]))2 This immunity exists because the law presumes that they do not have the mental capacity to understand the consequence of their actions. Thus, without mental capacity or intention to commit the act, merely doing the action would not be enough to call it a crime.

https://nyaaya.org/guest-blog/what-happens-when-a-child-commits-a-crime/

So ruhi can not be held responsible for ak's mistake.

Roohi was 7 toh uspe yeh laagu nhi hota hai

Originally posted by: Pinecone

There is not reason to discuss why you or anyone else are blocked by anyone. its a personal choice to block someone and no explanation is needed and neither is it warranted to crack jokes about it and tag people as "immature" for blocking etc. Blocking doesnt prevent anyone from saying what they want to on the forum. you are still entitled to say what you want to. Blocking is a feature that merely helps avoid direct one to one engagement with a person and thats what people use it for.

That's fair - it's against the rules. I am happy to end this here.

Originally posted by: pyar-ishk

Yeah I didn't get why she wasn't shouting but running and waving

hand to get attention. DKP could've made it a little realistic to have

her shouting and if her sister didn't hear is one thing.

AK secretly wanted to do raam naam satya hai of Arohi because Arohi starting se bol rhi thi ki Akshu mahan ban ne ka natak kar rhi hai, but tab nobody believed Aaru toh Akshu was carefree, but now she realised sabko pta chal rha hai

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

i am more interested in aftermath of this track 🤣

If ab sends ruhi to jail then everyone will hate ab including armaan, goenka's and vidya.

If ab wins the case and judge says compensation de do. Bechare poor victim will have to use that money on hotel in which they stayed as 2 din ki chutti 15 din thak extend hogayi.

If ab looses the case and armaan gets dash cam to prove ruhi was framed and she is innocent moye moye moment for fl and ak revelation ke time masth band bajna chahiye from all side😂

If ab looses case and armaan proves that it's just a mistake from the kaka who was drunk by bringing some alcohol report phir again ab ka moye moye.

😁kalesh bharpoor milega 😂

if makers saw your post, they will be totally confused what scenario Ito take into consideration 😂 so that they can get high trps for this track