Originally posted by: RainFire125
Movies never do justice to books yaar. I feel it is not justified to do a comparison as books can be explained in detail and movies are restricted in context with time. A person has to be A class creative to show the essense of a book within a 2 or 3 hour movie.
@bold : this is exactly why POA is the best HP adaptation.. ofcourse cuaron is a superior director to Columbus and Yates and the other one..
In case of POA u will follow it even if u have not read the book.. he has made changes but tells the core story and theme of the book .. like I applaud his choice of leaving out teh entire marauders backstory.. I.love it in.the book but it's not that crucial to the overall arch of the 3rd book story which is always driven by harry .. so even though he knew he was leaving out something very close to fan's heart he did it..
And the visual changes he brought to the wizardung world just made it richer.. the shots of passage of time.. whooping willow.. and glimpses of every day magic just casually shown made the world so alive.. (like teh scenes in leaky cauldron.. a guy just sitting reading the book whereas his tea is magically stirred)
Spckally the later Yates movies felt like all fan favourite scenes put together.. like they thought if we don't knwo this scene fans will be furious..
Edited by minu_8 - 4 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount