Originally posted by: innocentindian
sure vazz
maybe i didn't word it well
that statement isn't a generalisation. I actually don't know too many people that have adopted, so can't discuss it to great lenght.
But what i have noticed is that there are some parents that take their kids for granted....being a parent is an immense responsibility. It's not just about taking the kids to football/cricket/dance etc, but it is also about instilling (or attempting to) as many good and wholesome qualities as one can. And this applies vice versa as well. The parents that i have seen take their kid for granted don't seem to have the time for them. They are tooo busy in their own lives. It really seems they don't want to do anything for their kids except keeping the kid with them.
On the other hand, there are people i have seen that are craving for kids. People that are doing so much to try and have kids, yet can't. They want to be parents. Yet they can't. Quite often (here anyway) a lot of those people are affluent as well. They have a lot of material sukh to offer the kid and are craving to give a kid love and patience as well, but just cannot. I just cannot help but wander that these people would make good parents and if they can't have their own, then why not adopt. That's all.
As I say, the statement was not a generalisation, but it was a personal observation.
I completely agree with you innocenindian. In order to be a bad parent, one does not have to adopt a child. The very own flesh and blood can be equally ignored.
My own hubby's father is a prime example. He used to be so busy in work that he did not even know which class his kids studied in. He did all the duties, sent them to right schools and colleges, got them all the material things that he thought his kids should have,but he never ever played or spent quality time with them. He never fed them, played with them, nor was he ever there to advise his kids when it was required. So the whole burden of bringing her kids fell on my Ma in law and unfortunately she was not a strict parent. Thankfully both her kids turned out well. She as a wife too got pretty neglected and died early due to a very late diagonisis of breast cancer. In fact he is the only father whom I have seen not take pride in his son's achievement and keep comparing as to how much success he himself achieved in that age, and if he did not, it was because he had a difficult life and my hubby has had it too easy. I have actually seen my hubby hanker for that small appreciation from my FIL which never comes.......
My hubby is just opposite to his father. He spends his every moment of free time with our kids and with him and generally loves to be around and participate in any kind of important function that my older son participates in. He does spoil them a lot but my FIL used to discourage him a lot saying bringing up kids is only a mom's responsibility, redicule him all the time, till the day my hubby got very angry and made it clear that he did not like to be told how he wanted to bring up his own kids, and that because he neglected them does not mean his son should do so too....... I felt bad for both of them, but that's reality......
Another interesting thing i feel like sharing. I have the most wonderful father ever. But it's a fact that he gives this tiny weeny bit more preference to my younger sister. Similarly, I am the apple of my mom's eye. Both me and my sis know this, and in fact at one point in our growing up period, this had become a teenage issue, like I used to keep cribbing how Papa loved my sis more and my sis complained how mom favoured meπ ......and the most surprising of all that both my parents are kind of embarrassed about it but never have really vociferously denied it.......Yet we both know how much both our parents love both of us to desperation.....
Like wise, for some inexplicable reason, I am just this a little more protective towards my older son than I am to my younger one.....π³
comment:
p_commentcount