Madhuri's smile lit up the world but Bahurani's smile....no comments 😀.
Was it a joke or anything I dont like any of them but comeon! even a kid can tell that no comparison between Aish and Madhuri. Aish was really very beautiful especially that innocent face. Agreed with other comments, Sonali, Manisha or karishma can still be compared, but madhuri i dont even find her attractive forget being most gorgeous girl ever
Originally posted by: Sparkling_Wine
Madhuri's smile lit up the world but Bahurani's smile....no comments 😀.
Madhuri should have had the role of Paro in Devdas, not Bahurani. SLB was damn ridiculous.
Bahurani is not good looking without make-up. Her face has always been painted with plenty of makeup and even in the 90s, she used to wear caked heavy makeup all the time.
It's weird for someone to say Bahurani is the most beautiful woman in the world and the most beautiful woman to ever have walked on the planet. Have they seen ALL the billions of women that live across the world? And that most beautiful woman tag is hilarious especially because she gave herself that title in 2004 when she hired an American PR agency to get a Hollywood career and they marketed her as a "Global Icon", "Most Beautiful Woman in the World", "Face of Bollywood to the West", "Bollywood's Queen"...
Madhuri looked good without make-up even though she had acne in early 90s. But Aish looks stunning only with professional styling and glamorous makeup. When she does her own makeup or wears minimal makeup, she ends up looking like a plain jane.
Originally posted by: Sparkling_Wine
Madhuri's smile lit up the world but Bahurani's smile....no comments 😀.
That is just Aish clicked at an awkward time. Aish looked almost perfect even without makeup in her youth.
Whereas Madhuri not only had severe acne in the 90s, which was visible even with the makeup. She also had extremely oily skin which was unsanitary looking from angles. Even today with the all the skincare available she has hyperpigmentation and swollen eyes without makeup. Again many people do. It is a natural byproduct of aging. But I think it is fair to say who looked prettier without the makeup. Since even makeup could not cover up Madhuri's flaws in her youth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7UHHyzWyAA
BTW.. Bringing Aish down is not going to help flop Abhishek Bachchan's status in any way. Who is a hopeless case in terms of looks with or without makeup? Even Madhuri is still 20 times more attractive then him without makeup.
No other woman can show up in the last ten seconds in an AD and completely steal the thunder from another really beautiful woman Mahima.
No other woman has been on so many international platforms that all raved about beauty. Has ranked in every international beauty poll.
Clicked at the right time, her smile can light up a room.
I really dislike to focus on the exterior when it comes to beauty and beautiful...
As actresses, both have a beauty I like equally.
Originally posted by: Clochette
I really dislike to focus on the exterior when it comes to beauty and beautiful...
As actresses, both have a beauty I like equally.
The exterior is far from everything. I agree beauty should just go beyond the surface level. But when a post asks we should answer honestly. Celebs know the day they sign up for the glamorous entertainment world they will be judged for this. If they were humanitarians, activists, doctors, or public service members I would not be so quick to judge.
Originally posted by: behindyou
Was it a joke or anything I dont like any of them but comeon! even a kid can tell that no comparison between Aish and Madhuri. Aish was really very beautiful especially that innocent face. Agreed with other comments, Sonali, Manisha or karishma can still be compared, but madhuri i dont even find her attractive forget being most gorgeous girl ever
No comparison between Ash and Madhuri ?
Why ?
In which universe ?
Both Ash and Madz were equally stunning in their peak days, with Madhuri had that magical aura & charisma which Ash lacked.
---------
comment:
p_commentcount