@bold The only thing holding Vedika back from hitting Sagar was she had something in her hands. LOL! She looked irritated with him over and over again. 
IKR!! Both sisters were like: "How dare you?"
Felt bad for Koel too, that is her celeb crush and she gets introduced as PA ki PA 
From Vedika's comment about not watching television and being occupied with the school, I don't think she has ever had a love interest or time for it. Sagar is probably the first man that she has expressed interest in. Also, Sagar noticed Vedika has been dressing up nicely since she's been at the Maheshwari Mansion but he doesn't realize it's all for him. She was looking so cute!
Yeah, seems like he is her first love and vice versa (as Jhanvi) 
But they need to move forward from them "falling in love' now, and show something a little more dignified I guess. Hope they take that into consideration.
@red I didn't appreciate how everyone stared at Shivangi when her wardrobe malfunctioned. No one helped or covered her, and the room was full of men. How embarrassing?
Yes, absolutely disgraceful tbh. Idc who the hero is, he can save her as he deems fit (or not) but how can everyone else be okay with that either?
@blue I agree. This scene was off. I found Dayal wife's acting hilarious
. But they kept mentioning Dayal's son in this scene. I wonder if we will see a new character soon. Originally, I thought Himmat could be his son and there for revenge but this proves otherwise.
I actually remembered you when you watched it and was like, there goes your theory 
Probably your prediction of him being Koel's 'partner' might come true though.
It was also funny seeing Rajeshswari and Vedika fight over the letter. I don't typically laugh at old people falling but I did this time . She hurt her hips!!! But can't dadi be jailed for tampering with evidence for a case? Both Vedika and Dayal's wife have proof that she tore the letter so can't they mention this in court? Plus Vedika has half of the letter which is proof it was torn.
The way they shot the scene is just soooooooo abrupt
Evidence can be divided into three categories broadly namely, (i) wholly reliable, (ii) wholly unreliable and (iii) neither wholly reliable nor wholly unreliable. If evidence, along with matters surrounding it, makes the court believe it is wholly reliable qua an issue, it can decide its existence on a degree of probability. Similar is the case where evidence is not believable. When evidence produced is neither wholly reliable nor wholly unreliable, it might require corroboration, and in such a case, court can also take note of the contradictions available in other matters.
In short, they have to first officially present it to court for them to determine if the written or spoken testimony even counts. They have to back it up by solid proof such as CCTV or even maybe the film shoot cameras may have captured it visually.
Also, I bet Lali has proof of Maheshwari's wrong deeds on her phone. She is always recording videos so I am sure her phone will soon be helpful in the case.
Yepp, she may have not realised it, but her videos do have a lot of stuff.
comment:
p_commentcount