btw pattern se yaad aaya
first let XYZ countries invade ABCD Countries. let them loot, destroy and demolish ancient culture and wealth of ABCD country.
then let them (XYZ) declare that’s their place. Wait until those people of ABCD countries revolt and go to war. tab tak ABCD logon ke mazak udathe rahe.
then we can stand (not literally stand, SM pe baithke) with oppressed people of ABCD countries. Take part in protests, rallies, vigils etc etc.
ye bhi ek pattern hain.
Originally posted by: mintyblue
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/the-idol-and-the-mosque
The idea that a temple was there before is disputed and not proven
The presence of temple is very well proven both by ASI and by court
You believing in a random article over them is your bias and cant be helped
Originally posted by: mintyblue
Well, I have never read this in any history book.
The evidence supporting the existence of such a temple is largely based on religious texts and traditions rather than conclusive archaeological evidence.
It is based on proper archeological evidences (and guess what the head of that archeological survey team was KK Muhammed
Just because you have read limited history books, the fact won't change
Waise now I feel inko kya hi jawab dena
Ram mandir ban gayi hai, ignore others
Team
This is becoming a norm
Throughout people are mocking and targeting one religion while nothing has been said about other religion
So still discussions going on? Kya hi kahe ab..bas itni si baat hai
जाकी रही भावना जैसी, प्रभु मूरत देखी तिन तैसी।
comment:
p_commentcount