Who will expose Savi to Arjun? (Piratīçā Vanavā Urī Peṭalā) - Page 13

Yes i thought so too that Inspector Golamade got all the information he required on Savi, Dipu and Camki.

BTW how did he know that a station in Bhiwandi had a theft reported a year ago ? Doesn't he have enough on his plate that he wants to dig out stuff from another place....

Also what makes him doubtful that Saavi and gang could be behind that theft ? Sab kuch jhol hai.....

Çamaki is finally back on screen! When she asked Savi, "Ḍokyāvara paḍalīsa kā tū?" I thought Savi would retort, "Nāhī, paṇa mī chātīvara goḷī jhelalī hotī tevhāṃ tū kuṭhe haravalī hotīsa?"

Çamaki's conversation with Savi established that Vishvambhar didn't give Savitri a fake birthdate when he created her fake identity. Retaining a real birthdate makes it easier to expose a person in hiding.

Vishvambhar fretted that he had destroyed all the proofs against Savi to avoid implicating himself. I guess he means that the Bhiwandi police station has no record of Savi stealing Vishvambhar's car full of money-laundering jewelry, nor sadoṣa manuṣyavadha of Sahil who is actually alive. This must have happened after Vishvambhar sent Inspector Kokate to tell Arjun that Dipak and Suvarnalata are robbers.

Are the records really destroyed, or did Vishvambhar only give the order to Inspector Kokate?

Arjun told Inspector Golamade that he met his wife almost a year ago. Although courtships of a few months or only a few days are commonplace in India, arranged marriages being the norm, Inspector Golamade found it amusing.

Piratīçā Vanavā Urī Peṭalā just completed its ninth month on air.

In late January, Vishvambhar had given Savi the task of convincing Arjun to marry her within a month! They spent months complaining about the plan taking too long.

Inspector Golamade used the word viśvāsa-ghāta, and Arjun sank into his chair, mouth falling open, eyes watering, shoulders involuntarily rising and falling as his head moved side-to-side ... Indraneil Kamat's body language was spot-on!

When Arjun said that Savitri's mother lives in Mumbai, and Inspector Golamade responded as if it was news to him that Savitri had invented a fake mother in Mumbai, that was a double retcon. On more than one occasion previously, Arjun had headed to Savitri's fake address in Pune, thinking that he would meet Shyamal there. When Arjun took Savitri, Suvarnalata, and Priya to Mumbai, there was no mention of visiting Savitri's mother; he didn't know that she used Shyamal's home to meet Sharada! And Inspector Golamade already pondered Savitri's trajectory from Mumbai to Kavathe-Bhairavgad. Golamade shouldn't need to ask Arjun for Shyamal's address in Mumbai at this point. And how can he assume that the address will help him to investigate Shyamal? Shyamal wouldn't have given her real address to Arjun!

When Arjun showed up at Sharada's door, she didn't say his name. Does she still think his name is "Vidyadhar?"

And where does Sharada live, anyway?

I was hoping that Arjun would cross paths with Paras, who knows him as the Chairman of KBS Bank.

However, when Sharada said Paras's name, Arjun didn't remember how Savitri had gone to attend the sākharapuḍā of her friend Paras who had come home from Dubai. Arjun didn't discover that Paras is a local rickshaw driver and not engaged to marry anyone.

What motive does Arjun have to allow Sharada to go on calling him Vidyadhar? With Paras aware that Vidyadhar is the name of the Chairman's elder brother, how can this misunderstanding lead to anything?

Overall, Thursday's episode made good use of many flashbacks as Arjun fit the pieces together.

Arjun only knows that Savi is the robber Sapna, not why she came to work for him and married him. He has yet to discover Vishvambhar's plan and how Vidyadhar encouraged Savi not to confess.

Am surprised how Paras didn't mention about Arjun coming to her house when he spoke with Saavi.

Arjun could have punished Savi with heavy manual labour without cancelling the request to Shembekar. It was out of character for Arjun to deprive poor labourers of a day of work when he's usually sensitive to their needs.

For a non-emergency, Golamade's police cars didn't need sirens blaring.

Where I live in Canada, police cars, ambulances, and fire trucks don't use their sirens unless they're responding to an emergency. Their staff don't like noise pollution any more than the rest of us.

How is it in India?

Golamade was ready to arrest Vishvambhar and Balaram without hearing what crime Krishna'i thought they had committed.

Krishna'i only knows that they tricked Savi and blackmailed her to trick Arjun out of the property. They haven't been implicated yet in the multiple attempts to murder or maim Arjun.

When Vishvambhar snarled at Krishna'i that her pride and conceit are thanks to him, I got the impression that he wasn't referring to his false claim that he expanded the business empire. More likely, he was referring to how Krishna'i married Bhalachandra.

It's possible that Vishvambhar was thinking of how he murdered either Bhima'i or Bhalachandra or both, but Krishna'i wouldn't know about that.

On Wednesday's episode, I enjoyed the acting of both Ram Daund as desperate, angry Vishvambhar and Leena Palekar as grieving Mona.

"काय करणार होते रे मी? कशाला थांबली म्हणजे काय? नवऱ्याने टाकून दिलेली बाई एवढ्या रात्रीअपरात्री कुठे जाणार होती? ही अबला नारी कुठे जाणार होती? एवढी वणवण करत कुठे फिरणार होते रे मी? आता नवऱ्यानं तोंडावर दार बंद केल्यावर रडत बसण्याशिवाय ऑप्शनच नव्हता!"

Savi's vulnerability, loneliness, rejection, and discomfort are real, but she jokes about her situation to let Arjun know that she can bear the rough times for him, not for his kindness. I enjoyed Rasika Wakharkar's performance of this dialogue.

On the other hand, I didn't enjoy Krishna'i's flashback that established that she knew all along that Arjun wasn't Bhalachandra's child. As recently as the November 30 episode, Krishna'i seemed confused, not caught, when Vishvambhar questioned her statements that Balaram and Arjun have the same father and Arjun is a Kavathekar by blood.

Krishna'i knew that her husband was committing a crime of deceptive bigamy, and she didn't warn Bhima. That totally wrecks the respect we've seen from Krishna'i for Bhima's memory.

I thought that Bhalachandra would have married Bhima legally by divorcing Krishna. But no, he risked going to prison for 10 years.

The scene in which Arjun's mother's name was revealed was when he reminisced with Krishna'i about being in shock, unable to cry when Bhima'i died. With Balaram only 2-3 months old when Bhalachandra announced his intention to marry Bhima without revealing his marital status, and with Bhima dying a few months into the marriage, Arjun couldn't have been old enough to comprehend death!