Originally posted by: Cold-Fire
Okay I have some time, so here is my response as I found this message really good, but I just want to say few things or questions and then conclusion.....
Keeping everything aside, I am just gonna ask your opinion for two questions:
1) When Patralekha was a proven (by law) criminal awaiting her trial, and Sai had made it clear she will not live under the same roof as that child-snatching wretched person, why did Virat support her against his own wife's wishes, rather why wasn't Virat willing to respect his wife's boundaries then?
Definitely PL was criminal, definitely Sai cleared all that and Virat chose to bail out her... but for me, in all this ,you know what matters the most.....is what Sai opted for, without any guilt and specially when it was the result of fight between them and nothing else... You know what I believe is ,we or anyone is not allowed to justify something which is not in our rights, this is what Sai did wrong there.... Monopoly over kid, abusing a father, didn't understand the overall situation and drew boundaries, which wasn't acceptable and specially when the whole family was against you in different ways- this never seems right..... Respect is a two way factor, so whom I will be supporting- the guy who did all that for family's reputation or kaku's emotional drama, when elders and the whole family were in a sense in favour of that and not because of his own will or will I be siding a woman who immediately put a condition against Virat, a dad( when Kaku did all that blackmailing skit) that either he should do what she wants ,otherwise lose rights on child and she will be taking the child away from him..... that's why giving respect after all this is not even a topic, specially when you are the origin....Virat should have chosen Sai in a way that it was possible but what he got there..... no way, PL was a compoundable criminal ,so Virat and elders taken the case back and PL had changed there it was the first time she was feeling guilty ,she was no more the same woman but Sai in this course of emotions, only prioritised herself without even considering that Virat is being emotionally blackmailed by Kaku a mother like figure for him and then Vinu's condition to him.....
Being a mother it's not a joke that you are- I can be like my aaba and nurture my child on my own and saying all that in front of Virat ,it seemed the way that Virat is no one to Vinu, I was really shocked by the dialogues that they gave to her....
What I actually wanna say is that ,Virat would have easily felt for Sai, if she wouldn't have dealt in that stubborn and superioritising manner, Kaku was wrong, she showed what she was always but what about you????? You were also wrong there, to give prioritisation 10 on 1 to fight with Kaku and not understanding Virat's end that how he will react when two of his very closed ones are standing on two opposite poles and she served the negative side in that so it resulted this way...
I just want to say pls understand this that Sai didn't clear, she abusively warned a parent when neither law nor humanity permits that act and it wasn't about Pakhi vs Sai but Family vs Sai when Virat was being thrown out by Sai in the flow of her personality traits and illogical decision....Virat was the one who got crushed between both of them and lost everything, when on the other side Sai herself rooted for all that.....it was needed from Sai to understand Virat and not Virat to favour Sai against family specially when Sai had countless ways to deal with it and PL got changed and when they all got conscious about her past just then and on the other hand Virat only had a single emergent option and then deal with it further in an organised way where he needed Sai's support.....
2) When Sai was supposed to be dead, V wanted to adopt a child (which he could easily do as a single male in India, since Vinayak was a male child and also he had a full family to take of the said child in his absence), why did he decide to marry the one woman who was responsible for him losing his wife and son? If anything he should hating her for separating him from the love of his life, why marry that person and misuse/bend the law (again) to adopt? (As one can't adopt with a criminal history, like Patralekha, and a couple cannot adopt before two years of their marriage, so we are to assume that he bend the legalities using his position of ACP/DCP, whatever he was at that time)
This part is good but according to me for Virat, PL was the only way to satisfy the condition of compulsion of marriage as he was all alone and had his whole life in front of him and with the intension that he will never be moving on, he agreed to marry PL for adoption purpose and at the same time a loveless marriage for him which he wanted.....and for the other things it was institutional requirement as being shown there that you being single is not allowed to adopt, I know some of the orphanages( as I belong to a family of professionals and officers) , which grant special permissions from government for adoption purposes, specially when the admission of the orphans belongs to the scenario of serious accidents of the past and they are handicaps or have many serious issues and what you are saying later in second bracket is right but does it matters, both Sai and PL are criminals if you really know this that parental kidnapping, offender of marriage voidance and involvement of a murderer, rapist,etc all these are really big crimes and not even compoundable like PL's so with this criminal history, Sai is still having solo custody of Savi without any permissions and in reality permissions will never be granted to her, moved on in her life when your marital status is of a marriage voider when you aren't allowed to move on and many more so considering all this if Virat married PL for reasons and conditions whose criminal background was being eliminated by the family's permission as it was an issue inside the four walls and he married to her when singles can do that but institutional requirement allowed him to get married and adopt not the conditions of two years and all as not being shown so we can't say this or even assume all these.....Everyone is different as a person, Virat is not a guy who believes in revenge if you are feeling sorry and have changed that part so he should be angry on PL after one year when he adopted and have seen her changed avatar is not a right claim, PL was 24/7 present in front of everyone and she also helped with Aai and Kaku to facilitate Virat to overcome from that mental trauma cum suicidal depression of losing son and wife.....
I am not here to fight, genuinely wanted to know the flipside opinion in a respectful manner. Good luck for your exams!👍🏼
You were really respectful and I think I have also given my opinions as you wanted in a clear manner and thank you ....
comment:
p_commentcount