Originally posted by: NoraSM
I said, Arjun was "Key" player, The MVP of Mahabharata, Krushna was Lord himself, he is not a player but a moderator according to the story, The fact that Krushna was with Arjun makes him the MVP, if I remember correctly then Bheema had expressed how helpless they are without Arjuna, moreover I didn't say "He is the only player"
You said that Arjun didn't care about Draupadi and he didn't go to swayamvar with his will. Arjun wasn't someone who would let a man insult a woman because he didn't 'care' about her, people protect strangers then Draupadi was in every part of his life, she shared every relationship with him that a woman shares with a man except his mother, grandmother and daughter, Draupadi was his wife, his friend, mother of his child, his bhabhi, his bahu and most importantly she is his queen, I didn't debate whether he cared for her or not because I would care for a dog who has been living with me for one month.
See, I think you mentioned you have not read much of the epic. I must implore you to do so and share your thoughts here after reading, hoping you would see my point then. Not caring about her is not the main reason I stated, I said for Arjun, his brothers and mother was always more important than his wife. And again, he would by no means wage war, for him probably standing by the promise his elder bro made (that is Yudhi's putting Drau on bet) was more important. I don't see him in bad light for other reasons I have, infact I am considered an Arjun fan in the forumπ In today's lenses, ofcourse he will be considered an ardent anti feminist misogynist. But I do feel the things I stated above were more important to Arjun than his wife was at that time. (She was his wife, not Queen as Arjun wasn't a King π). That I feel, was the reason for his silence.
That was just his relationship with her, Arjun was a Kshatriya, Kshatriya Dharma compels them to protect everyone, so 'Arjun didn't care about Draupadi' is just bizarre
Alright, I take back those few words but you might want to go back and read my post again. This isn't the only thing I stated. I said many more important reasons why he might have been silent as I have stated in this post too. But yet I stand by my words because if someone would have cared, they would have bothered to atleast speak up rather than still remaining quiet, like Bheem did. Lastly, dharma is quite complicated. In my eyes too, he should have protested, but again, Dharma also teaches to stand by an elder brother, and be loyal to all his decisions. Dharma sankat isn't that easy to be solved, I guess.
His character is way more complex than this, one dimensional 'I don't like her so go have your way with her, even though she is my wife'
I never thought you were justifying Arjun, I just said that the reason you gave is too one dimensional and robotic
comment:
p_commentcount