Anupam Kher hits back at Naseeruddin Shah - Page 3

Originally posted by: RegressiveThug

India doesn't need population control act yet, what it needs is education growth. Population growth will be controlled automatically. A law controlling population will be detrimental in long run.

And not all village people or even urban people vote reading all the political party manifestos.

bold- why? India needed it kn 90s actually because that would have made population growth stable in another decade. Now at earliest in 2070s, our population growth will be stable. We really can't sustain that. We don't have technology and natural resource tk sustain 150-170 cr population. We need to check the growth.

I am not getting your point how it will be detrimental.

Are you thinking about sex ratio because I don't think govt will bring one child policy. They have seen its result in China. It will be two child policy.

BTW I do think BJP will bring UCC and Pop control act soon. May be next year or after UP election.

Originally posted by: Sunflower234

I have asked this question earlier also but no one answered?

How uniform civil code is good ? I mean economically as well as socially?

UCC means all personal dispute like marriage etc will be treated same irrespective of religion. Like marriage- right now every religion has its own law. Muslims have their own personal laws, sikh, Christians, parsi, Buddhists etc etc every one have different laws- inheritance, marriage, divorce, alimony. After UCC, there will be a common law for every person in India.

Originally posted by: Padfoot_Prongs

UCC means all personal dispute like marriage etc will be treated same irrespective of religion. Like marriage- right now every religion has its own law. Muslims have their own personal laws, sikh, Christians, parsi, Buddhists etc etc every one have different laws- inheritance, marriage, divorce, alimony. After UCC, there will be a common law for every person in India.

So like what will be the benefit of this?

Naseeruddin Shah always sounds salty and frustrated. Well, should have done more commercial films.

Calling AK, a bootlicker doesn't make his comment any less truculent. The blood one was just nasty.

Originally posted by: Sunflower234

So like what will be the benefit of this?

gender equality. Religious authorities will have less say with personal issues. There are so many gray areas with so many laws present for these matters that a loophole can be found easily. With one law for everyone, these loopholes will decreased.

And all these equality chants going on, UCC will provide equality in true sense.

why is Naseer always so salty and bitter about everyone......... he is respected and praised so much for his talent, if he thinks he didnt get his due then thats not other actors or citizens faults.....

This guy needs to meditate a bit, to realize that there is life beyond acting and one doesnt need be so frustrated all the time.......

India is overpopulated and on top of that bangladeshi immigrants

population should be strictly controlled

1 kid or no kid should be the rule and it should be rewarded

and all communities and religions should follow this rule strictly.

I don’t know what’s going on but I’ll comment anyway. I’d bet big amounts of money this is about Naseerudin Shah loosing touch with reality

Naseer Shah is always frustrated. Don’t know why.

In 70’s he got fame due to parallel movies. Then he acted in Tridev, a commercial cinema. Oye Oye got him fame. Suddenly he turned back against art movies. He said, one could only make name, but never money from those movies. Other arty movie stars (like Shabana, Deepti Naval) did not appreciate his comments.
True, those movies might not have paid him well. But he sustained (and got commercial movie) because of it.
There was no chance, he could have got a red carpet welcome from commercial cinema. Kicking the plate which feeds him is his hobby. (If he criticises India, it should not come as a surprise).

May be his jealousy towards Amitabh, Rajesh Khanna is because of their success in 70s, when he was also a lead actor (in parallel movies) but paid in peanuts.

Also, he was quite in demand for parallel movies earlier. But after Amitabh got aged, he started taking up roles which probably would have gone to Naseer. Anupam Kher too. Again they get paid well. So his frustration.

Originally posted by: Padfoot_Prongs

UCC means all personal dispute like marriage etc will be treated same irrespective of religion. Like marriage- right now every religion has its own law. Muslims have their own personal laws, sikh, Christians, parsi, Buddhists etc etc every one have different laws- inheritance, marriage, divorce, alimony. After UCC, there will be a common law for every person in India.

On bold. I don’t think so. I think till 50s or 60s, all religions had their own rules. (Like Hindus also had polygamy earlier). A bill was brought in to put all these religions under a constitutional rule and constitution banned polygamy for Hindus. Most religions came under this act (including Christianity). But this law was not extended to Muslims.

In 80’s, court was dealing with a triple talaaq case where a man was paying very meagre amount to his ex wife (Shanbano case; https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohd._Ahmed_Khan_v._Shah_Bano_Begum ). First it ordered the man to pay alimony for the rest of her life. Later the government changed the bill because, Islamic organisations opposed court order (saying court is intervening in their religion).

Since then, this demand is present. To put Muslim community also under same rules as other religions.