PreRish/KaRica AT #74|Tormented by an Insufferable and Frivolous Woman - Page 89

Originally posted by: EtherealRati

if anurag is the one who has trapped bajaj.....will it not reflect very bad on anurag as a character....i mean woh bhi is show mein lead hain....why will they show him trapping bajaj ???....i feel koi third person niklega instead

no third person. A has been down this path of destruction ever since he couldn't accept the fact that P is someone else wife. Everything he has done so far was to get P. His behavior changed he became more erratic. He even started drinking. The trio is the one that planned this as in their view P belongs to A and bajaj is the bad person. However A will get a redemption arc in the future months to come.

Originally posted by: munnihyderabad

he will get a redemption arc ... ..

any third person being involved will dilute the entire premise and the goal of this track

P's constant claims of trusting A above anyone , even before herself needs to failed for them to set up prerish if at all they are looking in that direction .... any 3rd person involving would mean .. 3rd person will be grouped as RB's ploy only and nothing more ..

Exactly - her entire conversation is literally saying over and over 'you believe Mr. Basu over me even when I've told you the whole truth from perspective'. He keeps hammering that as the foundation of their conversation, and her only comeback is that why shouldn't she believe A because the entire world does. That's her reason lol.

Originally posted by: vena.cava.

So watching this live was a mistake, LMAOOOO, I can't fast forward through her face.

Close your eyes darling😂 #loophole

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

Yup. There's like 20% chance for CVS to take a risk this big. This will completely make an enemy of the ML fandom. And Anurag's status as ML will get destroyed too. Even if they somehow spin it as his desperation in love theres no coming back from this. MLs don't play cunning games like framing someone for murder to get the girl. That's what villains do. And since this Anurag is not the sidelines Cezanne version,to make an enemy outta Parth's fandom is too costly a deal.

wahi toh....though the theory really make sense.....but i personally refuse to believe that its anurag character who has framed bajaj.....its impossible because he is the lead too.....him playing with everybody's emotions is too much too take for the general audience. I dont think ekta mam is scared of fandoms though....she is too strong to handle that. But why would they turn a positive character to a negative one......there is no point in doing that.

And now that convo with Shivi - dil se keh rahe hoon, sambhalo khud ko phir se mat girna.

Why the importance on this scene? The implication that is doubled with how that sounds with the popular theory that he is behind this. They focused heavily on her saying that he needs to bring himself back up and never fall (to this level) ever again. That's some pretty strong stuff I won't lie.

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

Yup. There's like 20% chance for CVS to take a risk this big. This will completely make an enemy of the ML fandom. And Anurag's status as ML will get destroyed too. Even if they somehow spin it as his desperation in love theres no coming back from this. MLs don't play cunning games like framing someone for murder to get the girl. That's what villains do. And since this Anurag is not the sidelines Cezanne version,to make an enemy outta Parth's fandom is too costly a deal.

He believes that P belongs with him. No one got hurt except him. However he did a bad thing by framing bajaj. In his eyes bajaj is the enemy he has to take down. As shin_chan said a redemption arc will come into play. His character undergo a transformation since Switzerland. There is no going back.

Originally posted by: SanyaEterna

Close your eyes darling😂 #loophole

Kyun? Main Bajaj ki tarah hypnotize nahi honi waali iss ladki se 😡

Originally posted by: EtherealRati

wahi toh....though the theory really make sense.....but i personally refuse to believe that its anurag character who has framed bajaj.....its impossible because he is the lead too.....him playing with everybody's emotions is too much too take for the general audience. I dont think ekta mam is scared of fandoms though....she is too strong to handle that. But why would they turn a positive character to a negative one......there is no point in doing that.

nobody is a saint. Which is what bajaj told A. Those dialogues that bajaj told A how he has everything and everyone love and that he believes he is a saint. The truth of the matter is that everyone lies, cheats and does some kind of betrayal. A is no different. Him doing this doesn't ruin his character. Nor makes him negative. It just makes him WRONG in the audience view.

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

Yup. There's like 20% chance for CVS to take a risk this big. This will completely make an enemy of the ML fandom. And Anurag's status as ML will get destroyed too. Even if they somehow spin it as his desperation in love theres no coming back from this. MLs don't play cunning games like framing someone for murder to get the girl. That's what villains do. And since this Anurag is not the sidelines Cezanne version,to make an enemy outta Parth's fandom is too costly a deal.

If they choose to go this route - I think they will terribly cushion the blow and then immediately whitewash it/make it seem like he had very valid reasons to do it. Because if they do what some of our own fandom hopes - bringing back the Ruthless in RB, then the character contrasts will be hard to ignore and in A's fandom eyes A will have been justified because well RB is ruthless see! But that requires smart writing, which you know these CVs don't have lol.

Originally posted by: vena.cava.

Exactly - her entire conversation is literally saying over and over 'you believe Mr. Basu over me even when I've told you the whole truth from perspective'. He keeps hammering that as the foundation of their conversation, and her only comeback is that why shouldn't she believe A because the entire world does. That's her reason lol.

that was clear contrast..
when both said the same,.. one said unintentionally the other said intentionally
but she chose one over the other despite having NO proof against anyone , to substantiate her decision ..

if A is exposed let's see what happens to the trust of entire world and her own trust