I just had my Eureka moment :D

In the title "Dil hi toh hai" , "Dil" does not mean "Heart" . "Dil" means "Daughter-in-law" ...which means D-I-L hi toh hai.

Never agreed more! 

Originally posted by: mysterygirl123

In the title "Dil hi toh hai" , "Dil" does not mean "Heart" . "Dil" means "Daughter-in-law" ...which means D-I-L hi toh hai.

Which is why practically every member of the Noon family (including Mamta Noon) treats her as they like - at their whim and fancy. When was she ever respected by any Noon and treated as a D-I-L should be treated? After all D-I-L hi toh hai!!!! 

Rithwik and Shivam are the only ones who have some saving grace, though Rithwik too seems to be losing out (courtesy the CVs foolish and "un-creative" desire to make a deliberate, not-logically-required separation)

Otherwise everyone either with a mask of a grey character (VP, Rishabh, Saanchi, Reeva) or a mask of a supposedly good character (Mamta, Dadi) treated her like a "thing" that incidentally is now connected to the family like a "hair-extension" which can be kept or removed at will. The focus has always been Rithwik's emotions and welfare, never Palak's.

Originally posted by: mysterygirl123

In the title "Dil hi toh hai" , "Dil" does not mean "Heart" . "Dil" means "Daughter-in-law" ...which means D-I-L hi toh hai.

Which is why practically every member of the Noon family (including Mamta Noon) treats her as they like - at their whim and fancy. When was she ever respected by any Noon and treated as a D-I-L should be treated? After all D-I-L hi toh hai!!!!

Rithwik and Shivam are the only ones who have some saving grace, though Rithwik too seems to be losing out (courtesy the CVs foolish and "un-creative" desire to make a deliberate, not-logically-required separation)

Otherwise everyone either with a mask of a grey character (VP, Rishabh, Saanchi, Reeva) or a mask of a supposedly good character (Mamta, Dadi) treated her like a "thing" that incidentally is now connected to the family like a "hair-extension" which can be kept or removed at will. The focus has always been Rithwik's emotions and welfare, never Palak's.

It is so well thought of .. even viewers like me have always taken rickys emotion what about poor palak she got so much abuse and hate from her in laws .. she had slog her ass of at work then had to donkey mission dropping packages to suit somebody's ego


Rishabh looked at her like she's a s**t


She got s**t-shamed by her Father in law , Brother in law and sisters in law
Hubby not working who has multiple issues


Still she has to take him into account

MAmta and dadi literally treated her like a hair extensions sometimes needed or can be thrown out

I am going use this example at twitter ( will give u credit )
Why would she want to get back with him in season 2Edited by msin - 5 years ago

Originally posted by: mysterygirl123

In the title "Dil hi toh hai" , "Dil" does not mean "Heart" . "Dil" means "Daughter-in-law" ...which means D-I-L hi toh hai.

Which is why practically every member of the Noon family (including Mamta Noon) treats her as they like - at their whim and fancy. When was she ever respected by any Noon and treated as a D-I-L should be treated? After all D-I-L hi toh hai!!!! 

Rithwik and Shivam are the only ones who have some saving grace, though Rithwik too seems to be losing out (courtesy the CVs foolish and "un-creative" desire to make a deliberate, not-logically-required separation)

Otherwise everyone either with a mask of a grey character (VP, Rishabh, Saanchi, Reeva) or a mask of a supposedly good character (Mamta, Dadi) treated her like a "thing" that incidentally is now connected to the family like a "hair-extension" which can be kept or removed at will. The focus has always been Rithwik's emotions and welfare, never Palak's.

Completely agree Edited by geniuslibra - 5 years ago

Seriously.. I didn't get sleep till 2AM due to frustration 😉

Haha Bang on.. har ek D-I-L ka Dil Rithwik ke liye hain!!!

I have not read a better review of the episode than this one till now !!! You said it all girl

Originally posted by: mysterygirl123

In the title "Dil hi toh hai" , "Dil" does not mean "Heart" . "Dil" means "Daughter-in-law" ...which means D-I-L hi toh hai.

Which is why practically every member of the Noon family (including Mamta Noon) treats her as they like - at their whim and fancy. When was she ever respected by any Noon and treated as a D-I-L should be treated? After all D-I-L hi toh hai!!!! 

Rithwik and Shivam are the only ones who have some saving grace, though Rithwik too seems to be losing out (courtesy the CVs foolish and "un-creative" desire to make a deliberate, not-logically-required separation)

Otherwise everyone either with a mask of a grey character (VP, Rishabh, Saanchi, Reeva) or a mask of a supposedly good character (Mamta, Dadi) treated her like a "thing" that incidentally is now connected to the family like a "hair-extension" which can be kept or removed at will. The focus has always been Rithwik's emotions and welfare, never Palak's.

Originally posted by: mysterygirl123

In the title "Dil hi toh hai" , "Dil" does not mean "Heart" . "Dil" means "Daughter-in-law" ...which means D-I-L hi toh hai.

Which is why practically every member of the Noon family (including Mamta Noon) treats her as they like - at their whim and fancy. When was she ever respected by any Noon and treated as a D-I-L should be treated? After all D-I-L hi toh hai!!!! 

Rithwik and Shivam are the only ones who have some saving grace, though Rithwik too seems to be losing out (courtesy the CVs foolish and "un-creative" desire to make a deliberate, not-logically-required separation)

Otherwise everyone either with a mask of a grey character (VP, Rishabh, Saanchi, Reeva) or a mask of a supposedly good character (Mamta, Dadi) treated her like a "thing" that incidentally is now connected to the family like a "hair-extension" which can be kept or removed at will. The focus has always been Rithwik's emotions and welfare, never Palak's.