Page
of
1Originally posted by: priya_nka_yudkb
Yadi samar aur Jaya ka divorce hota hai to surana family ki 50% property Jaya ki hogi.
Why this? Just because she thought Rama will not agree to this?Because this sounds so out of they her character is portrayed so far. Why ask for property when her daughter is independent and can earn for herself... Being a lawyer can't she see that Rama has no right to make this promise cause she is not the sole owner of surana family's property..What do you guys think??
Originally posted by: cute.manasi
she is really testing the patience of other party .
Originally posted by: priya_nka_yudkb
Yadi samar aur Jaya ka divorce hota hai to surana family ki 50% property Jaya ki hogi.
Why this? Just because she thought Rama will not agree to this?Because this sounds so out of they her character is portrayed so far. Why ask for property when her daughter is independent and can earn for herself... Being a lawyer can't she see that Rama has no right to make this promise cause she is not the sole owner of surana family's property..What do you guys think??
Originally posted by: suresh555
Satya needs a therapist. Why is Jaya half owner of Samar's property when Samar and his family have no rights to anything Satya gives to Jaya? Why is Satya's mom such a wuss and not control her retarded daughter who is hell bent on breaking her daughter's marraiges. To me Satya sounds like a miserable greedy old woman. Anyone agree?
comment:
p_commentcount