Posted:
I mean unless its a detective show. The investigating officer has to be a champu unless he is the lead of the show.
This is such a poor case. The officer is missing the obvious links.
1) Rahul has no motive to kill Sheru. You need enough reason to kill someone so cruelly. It has to be a cold blooded murder which obviously needs proper planning.Why would he even register a case at all?
2) In a planned murder, who keeps the head of the victim with himself as a prized trophy especially when the dead body is missing? Isn it obvious the police would ransack each and every house?
3) The house where the head was found belonga to Shakti devi who her self was a convict and jailed for the crime committed.
4) Where is the murder weapon? Where did he get it and who helped him in a village where he has no friends?
5) Rahul lost his own brother here under suspicious circumstances. The officer investigating the case died under same circumstances. The villagers along with dada thakur didnt co operate with the police. Only Rahul helped them to trace the dead body of the police officer. It proves the villagers do not appreciate newcomers who question their way of living
6) That Rahul was supposedly was threatened to leave the village and he disobeyed Dada Thakur. He was not liked by many.
7) That Sarpanch was hiding his son after his son murdered vaidji's son. It could be a case of revenge. He has a motive
8) Few days ago another man died in the same fashion. Hos colleague claimed to have seen Kaal Bhairav himself that day.
9) Rahul said he had seen a horseman. Villagers felt the presence of a horse although the villager never had seen horses before.
10) That the tamrapatra had warned anyone going out at night.
11) The Adivasis are very secretive about their ways and donot allow outsiders. Both Sheru and Rahul had broken rules. The Adivasis also have a motive here.
12) Since the police is already involved, Shakti devi can and obviously had cleaned all te evidence. No evidence doesnt mean innocent.
comment:
p_commentcount