Originally posted by: Pehchaan.Kaun
Puri movie Dec 1 tak leak' ho jayegi π
Originally posted by: hermione82
Lamhe is not a historical movieIf Devdas credit goes to SLB then JA credit should go to Ashutosh G. Aint it?Though she is a good designer she was the designer of Ash's first Cannes debacle. #justsaying
Originally posted by: theeki.mithai
And then we will have a rehash of Udta Punjab with Piracy slogansπ
Originally posted by: theeki.mithai
And then we will have a rehash of Udta Punjab with Piracy slogansπ
kangana would say i am.an outsider, nepotism leaked my movie π
Originally posted by: Pehchaan.Kaun
That was leak from Censor Board right ? I guess more like TEPK team who tried to pull this gimmick prior to release and failed in their strategy in epic way π
Originally posted by: here4reviews
I guess that look is of Manikarnika and not Rani Laxmibai. She seems to be receiving the sword from either her father or some maratha (going by the bald head with the sikha.) That can't be her husband since Gangadhar Rao doesn't look like that so this is probably her look before her marriage. I'm pretty sure back then women would only wear sarees after they were married.
And that's not an anarkali, it looks like a type of mavala worn by Maratha warriors with that petha she is wearing on her head. I'm not sure what the dress is called up north but both Ash and Deepika had worn the same (white in color) in Jodha Akbar and Bajirao Mastani. So that is a legit warrior dress. Good to know they have not kept the dresses over the top. The film doesn't need the same. If anyone has watched the Jhansi Ki Rani TV show on Zee, you'll notice the costumes are similar. I don't see any fault in research here. Also, the pictures of Jhansi Ki Rani are all illustrations. Some have her in saree while some like Amar Chitra Katha has her in a mavala.Also, how did Neeta Lulla get Devdas wrong? π The film was set in the 1900's, zamindars dressed like that back then. How was it wrong?
comment:
p_commentcount