Got your point ππΌYour post was very interesting today, hence so many questions π³πInfact i never thought this track will ever grab my interest, but SKR'S version is really interesting
Got your point ππΌYour post was very interesting today, hence so many questions π³πInfact i never thought this track will ever grab my interest, but SKR'S version is really interesting
Exactly AditiUsually story ends with Siya's BPwhile Ram and bros leaving is shown just for formalityin one or two epsit may be of the thought that it's not a TRP trackOr they wanted to skip controversial partsI generally see either they accuse Ram or try avoiding those partswhich in turn creates more questionsSKR faced such situation head on and gave proper explanationnow we understand Ram's pain and dilemma more than anyonelsehats-off to team, SKR for taking up the challenge andpulling it off effectively
Originally posted by: shruthiravi
@aditi you have raised good questions , your some explanations are correct also and you should allow your thoughts to go in that direction itself. Reflection has other purpose also. Think of the other purpose. Next question you should ask is. Has justice been served, has adharma been removed. If it has been done and dusted with then why such a fate for man like Laku. ( This question comes for me after seeing SKR epi, previously I had taken it as Narayan making Laku feel the pain of banishment as it was he who actually said to Sita about banishment ) .
As you rightly said what happened to Sita was a perception of adharma because a perception had to be removed. Sita was made a victim, while she was not a victimBut what is going to happen to Laku is adharma. Ghor adharma. A man who has done duty towards his family, his brother, sacrificed all his personal happiness in the path of duty is getting the verdict of banishment from that kul. Once again Sanskriti and Prakriti plays here. Think about how it is playing. All my analysis of Sanskriti vs Prakriti should help you there.Another hint is connection to MB. The difference of what happens to Panchali in infamous hall of dice and what happens to Abhimanyu's unborn child in Uttara's womb. Which was greater adharma. How did that come out.
When I came to this Forum, someone said, this version will dare to blame Ram as well... And they did, they blamed him , Sita herself blamed him, n what happened?Now atleast I find myself more connected to Ram.. Infact i will say Uttarkand Ram is the real Lord Ram...Avoiding question on Ram, treating him a divine is actually running away from reality.I have seen the more ardent Ram bhakt, the more they say, "Uttarkand is not a part of real epic" ..(Even i said that π)Yes Ram was a divine, but why he was divine? That's what UK teaches us..Another thing SKR's UK is actually very different.The whole track is a vindication for Ram. Sita doesn't need to justify him in SKR. Which in all versions happen, Sita justifying every action of Ram ...It tells us, what if Ram had accepted Sita n Luv Kush without asking her for another AP , what if he had changed the rules of the society for his wife? What if he had apologized to Sita? Did Ram even felt guilty of what he did, or kept justifying himself saying it was due to Rajdharma? What if he repented? Earlier one would have said, Sita would have come back... but we saw in Skr, Sita didn't come back... As everything had a motive of greater good of society, Sita wasn't any victim of Ram, Ram , Sita were victims of society..Shows like SKR are neither meant for religious fanatics who can't hear anything against God nor for pro feminists, who will be happy to see Ram getting questioned, but when they get answers, they blindly avoid that... it's for those who are seeking for answers with an open mind πMany ppl say why Ram survived without Sita many years but couldn't live without Laku, the answer is here π
comment:
p_commentcount