Originally posted by: deejagi
So finally the blame of Sita Apaharan will befall on lakshman for cutting Shurpi's nose. I just could not bear her tone which had all the accusation that Lakshman did something unpardonable and that effect will have to be borne by her & her husband. While she knew ram did kill Tataka (the demon lady) to maintain the peace and didn't counter attack him, why is she doing this to Lakshman time and again? The director needs to tone down the intensity of Sita's dialogues.
Then what is the use of her feelings that something bad might happen on seeing the burnt lotus? (which were brought by her own husband and not by Lakshman. What was the point in venturing to the pond to pluck more flowers that to after she heard about a lady was about to drown in that very lake?
But one thing I am damn sure, the reason for ravan keeping her in Ashok van may not be because he didn't want to force her but He didn't want to hear her pravachan and to save his ears, he would have stationed her there with an instruction to inform him once she stops preaching on values and womanity (in line with humanity) but poor guys was not so lucky enough.
comment:
p_commentcount