Originally posted by: iDea-yeS-viruS
It's very much needed post before watching or reading Ramayana. honestly I'm pissed off when people claiming who is greater Ram or Sita?it sounds like which is greater word or meaning?Ramayana never sidelined Sita character. in fact I think whole Ramayana tried to explain one point how Ram took responsibilities of people and Sita took Ram responsibility to guide their children. how they both loyal to their commitments. Anyway I'm not impressed with this show one point. why CVS trying to project Lord Ram as Brave and power. Though Ram was unparalleled warrior, he was known for his kindness, sensitive, loyalty. I think CVS doing injustice to Ram character by projecting him as Great warrior.
Yes, exactly! I disliked Nikhil Sinha's interview where he said Sita was always a secondary character in Ramayan. Which Ramayan did he read? Neither Valmiki Ramayan nor Ramcharitmanas ever sidelined Sita, and I know other versions of Ramayan have many interesting stories about her too. If Ram is the male protagonist, Sita is the female protagonist. Ramayan cannot exist without either of them. They together create the very essence of the epic.
And I wish people would stop saying other television adaptations of Ramayan showed the "same old story" and this one will be different. Really? On what grounds will this one be different? Guess what? Siya Ke Ram may have a different title, but it's still the "same old story" as well. Whether from Sita's POV or Ram's POV or Hanuman's POV or even Lakshman's POV, the story is not going to change. Ramayan will be Ramayan, whatever title or POV you give it.
One other thing that's bothering me is that Nikhil Sinha is completely disregarding Ram's divine side. Yes, he reincarnated as a human, but he was not just a warrior, he was also very soft-natured, kind and sensitive, like you said. I hope Nikhil Sinha shows Ram and Sita as divine along with human.
comment:
p_commentcount