Who's more versatile? - Page 6

Originally posted by: starstruckk

I think Mikaal is more versatile. He chooses better roles than Fawad. Fawad is the better actor as he's more natural..but Mikaal has more range. I personally think Mikaal edges Fawad in comedy while Fawad edges Mikaal in romance.

No one could have played Afzal better than Hamza not even Fawad

Hamza shud not be compared with the other drama actors as the other drama actors hv done way more work than hamza and showed us many shades

Originally posted by: Raindrops.

Yes he needs to work more but I thought you were talking about versatility so he showed he can do MHSA maulvi, Waar, mere dard ko jo zaban mile mein he played a negative character, his upcoming film shows he is trying comedy. In fact in his small body of work he has already tried various different characters

My point in saying he needs to do more work is to prove himself more as an actor. There's a part of Hamza I see in every character he does...maybe it's the voice or the face/beard? I don't know. I like Hamza..he's very good but I don't think he can be compared to some of the other actors in terms of versatility..not yet at least. Versatility doesn't happen overnight...it's a whole process. He also has a knack of doing films with ensemble casts and in my opinion he never stands out the most in any of them. It goes back to what I'm saying. PA is what he gets credit for the most. The character had a lot of highs and lows, but that's just one character in one show..he could do another show where he has to play a full on romantic character and he may just fall flat on his face. I'd like to see him doing more work..attempting diverse characters and more as solo lead..and only then I think it's fair to judge.

Originally posted by: starstruckk

My point in saying he needs to do more work is to prove himself more as an actor. There's a part of Hamza I see in every character he does...maybe it's the voice or the face/beard? I don't know. I like Hamza..he's very good but I don't think he can be compared to some of the other actors in terms of versatility..not yet at least. Versatility doesn't happen overnight...it's a whole process. He also has a knack of doing films with ensemble casts and in my opinion he never stands out the most in any of them. It goes back to what I'm saying. PA is what he gets credit for the most. The character had a lot of highs and lows, but that's just one character in one show..he could do another show where he has to play a full on romantic character and he may just fall flat on his face. I'd like to see him doing more work..attempting diverse characters and more as solo lead..and only then I think it's fair to judge.

^ LEGENDS lol

Originally posted by: starstruckk

I agree. Sanam Baloch is a better actor than both Mikaal and Fawad. I'm glad we can agree on something. 😛

Originally posted by: harshu.sundas

why , we have agreed on many other things in the past .. But i agree, sanam baloch beats the crap of any other actor here, i mean look at her, she is so amazing, nothing else really matters now 👏

He played Talibani commander in Glorious Resolve, Malang (deaf & dumb) in Mud House & Golden Doll (his best work till date after PA), Molvi majeed in MHSA , Commander in Waar , full time -ve character in MDKJZM..rapist & in his telefilms like Ek tha Raja aur ek thi Rani & Gullo weds googli he proved he can do comedy too. I think first a person should see someone's full range of work before judging him.

Originally posted by: Raindrops.

Harshu everyone is crap apart from Sanam Baloch and Meekal 😆. They are legend aur hum jin ko follow karte hain they still have to prove themselves 😛