is this the twist? | Itna Karo Na Mujhe Pyaar

pyaaribehna

@pyaaribehna

Voyager

16

Posted: 9 years ago

#1

May be one fine day Neil aka Nachiket brought home a baby from hospital (but of course silly. where else would kids come from?) .

Ragini thought he cheated on her and got a kid from some lady (who died conveniently) and brought it home.

That broke the marriage and the trust and house. period.

courtesy . aap ki antaraa, veera , choti bahu etc etc etc.

3

Reply

Quote

exoLarmy

@exoLarmy

Rocker

28

+ 5

Posted: 9 years ago

#2

Good theory!

Maybe It was Neil's ex who got pregnant from someone else and she died but before dying she requested Neil to take her daughter in... She'll die before he can protest and Ragini might see him with the (pregnant) ex & might think he is having an affair.

But that doesn't mean they should separate. It's not strong enough there has to be another reason and that reason better be good!

edit: Unless Neil doesn't tell her the truth because he might feel that their marriage is already deteriorating as a result of Ragini's possessiveness and her "accusations."

He never got the chance to explain and she never a justification so both were right in their way... They had to end the relationship because it would've become even worse.

Edited by beautiful1 - 9 years ago

Reply

Quote

Alma

@halifax004

Voyager

19

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#3

But I remember in Aapki Antara the daughter was legit his's he had an affair with the mother and had Antara. Its just he never knew about it I think... cannot remember!!! But why would Neil do that in the first place if he actually cheated and brought a kid home that would ruin his character and I don't want extra material crap!!! If that is the case then I do not want them getting back again😔 Extra Materials are always the end game in relationships..cause one time a cheater always a cheater

Edited by halifax004 - 9 years ago

1

Reply

Quote

Ms.SK

@Ms.SK

Trailblazer

42

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#4

could be 5 kids are NR's. Ranbir the eldest was sent abroad (USA !!) was studying. hence when NR separated, there are only 4 kids shown.

.

when Neil settled in USA, Ranbir stayed with him!!.

.

then this theory goes out of window. why? because in today's episode Neil says to suhani - your mum wanted those two kids and allowed me to take both of you. why no mention of ranbir??!!! because ranbir not their child??

.

2

Reply

Quote

3serialfan40

@3serialfan40

Navigator

12

Posted: 9 years ago

#5

Originally posted by: Ms.S.K.
could be 5 kids are NR's. Ranbir the eldest was sent abroad (USA !!) was studying. hence when NR separated, there are only 4 kids shown.
.
when Neil settled in USA, Ranbir stayed with him!!.
.
then this theory goes out of window. why? because in today's episode Neil says to suhani - your mum wanted those two kids and allowed me to take both of you. why no mention of ranbir??!!! because ranbir not their child??
.

Could be Ranbir is actually Pam's. She likes him the most. She was separated and kept the kid. Controls the brother and his property. Close to her own kid, tolerates Agham and Suhani!

They split equally one boy one girl each.

1

Reply

Quote

pfalcon1949

@pfalcon1949

Voyager

18

Posted: 9 years ago

#6

Ranbir must not be a kid of Ragini and Neil for sure. He is much too old for that. Since Raagini is supposed to be 40 and Ranbir is good 25 years old. So I guess he is son of Pam, the devil. She is doing a "Savita Tai" role from Pavitra Rishta here. I see in fact several similarities between the two shows here.

Reply

Quote

-Piku-

@-Piku-

Sparkler

32

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#7

Originally posted by: pfalcon1949
Ranbir must not be a kid of Ragini and Neil for sure. He is much too old for that. Since Raagini is supposed to be 40 and Ranbir is good 25 years old. So I guess he is son of Pam, the devil. She is doing a "Savita Tai" role from Pavitra Rishta here. I see in fact several similarities between the two shows here.

Photo frame guys photoframe.

Ragini & Ranbir both have same preference

Reply

Quote