Your thoughts please!!
Page
of
1Originally posted by: lovely_lady
Idk, there's probably a lot of reasons why as divorces don't just occur over single reasons.
The clues we've gotten so far are: Ragini's possessiveness and controlling tendencies alienated Neil and pissed him off. Ragini's feelings of inadequacy, in terms of dependence, pissed her off.We've yet to see what traits and actions of Neil's contributed to their marriage breakdown. I'm assuming Neil's popularity with females contributed to it (as Ragini is very possessive).As for Pam, idk. She could've played a role. I think, like another poster pointed out, Pam probably wasn't a fan of Ragini from the beginning but tolerated her for the sake of her brother.Anyways, I don't blame Pam for not liking Ragini after the divorce (as Neil's sister who doesn't know the whole story, its obvious she would blame Ragini and side with her brother.And I'd much rather have Neil and Ragini be the architects of their own marriage breakdown rather than a third person. It would be a lot more interesting seeing them having to overcome personal challenges in order to try and make their relationship again. If Pam was the reason, once she is revealed, then Neil and Ragini would reunite easily and end of story. I think and hope Ekta's moving away from such easy characterizations and towards more greyer characters and character study shows like YHM, ADHY, and to an extent, JA.
Originally posted by: lovely_lady
And I'd much rather have Neil and Ragini be the architects of their own marriage breakdown rather than a third person. It would be a lot more interesting seeing them having to overcome personal challenges in order to try and make their relationship again. If Pam was the reason, once she is revealed, then Neil and Ragini would reunite easily and end of story. I think and hope Ekta's moving away from such easy characterizations and towards more greyer characters and character study shows like YHM, ADHY, and to an extent, JA.
comment:
p_commentcount