Posted:
Originally posted by: lnidhi30
Anu I didn't say you meant harm to Drau; where did you get that from?😔
My objection is with the perception that people have , they use these instances to put her down and in this process they put down her husbands also saying they didn't love her or cared for her specially using the Mahaprasthanika
In dharmakshetra they used fake incidents of she being attracted to karna and the andhe ka... to build up a fake case they have to resort to this . It only means that Draupadi was sinless
No, no, I meant the idea that using other versions would harm Drau's reputation further. It wouldn't was what I was trying to say, basically because ours does a lot of harm
Hubbies - Not that they didnt care for her, they didnt care ENOUGH for her. Not to speak up against the staking, and Yudhi certainly not during Jaydrath / Keechak incidents, and Arjun during Mahaprasthanika. Doesnt Drau herself say this to Yudhi during Vanaparva that he cares more for HIS concept of dharma than for her or his brothers?
Karna - Am afraid that part is in a lot of southern versions. Certainly is there in the Mallu version. However, looking at an eye catching man, is not falling in love with him. Dharmkshetra made it very clear, I thought
comment:
p_commentcount