Page
of
1Originally posted by: shivpriya
Just noticed some similarities between these two. Shakuni and Manthara both have been responsible for triggering two greatest epics- Mahabharat and Ramayan respectively. Both had some physical disabilities. Both were cunning and skilled in brain-washing. Both were not direct members of the families they ruined! Both did it for the benefit of their own sister/queen/relative etc. Shakuni wanted revenge for his family/sister, while Manthara did it out of jealousy and also care towards Kaikeyi. Though I do not like them at all and I think they are the real culprits for causing so much of destruction, but I still believe they owe the respect and credit for bestowing on us- these 2 great epics which are now an integral part of our knowledge and cultural heritage. Agree? 😉
Originally posted by: lovesunshine
i agree...
just that in the end Manthara felt real remorse for her acts...but shakuni till he died did not feel any remorse for what he did...
thats the difference between a woman and a man..women are greater 😊
The next day, Manthara was asked to look after the children as they played in the large courtyard. She reluctantly abandoned her usual chores to do so. The space was lined with lush grass and beautifully maintained. Dasaratha, who but five years ago longed to have a single son, now had too many sons to count. Manthara observed as they ran and played. They fought epic battles using their imaginations, play arrows, and wooden swords. When two of Dasaratha's favorite sons, Rama and Bharata, began getting too rough, Manthara intervened. Angry that a petty servant was giving him orders, Rama shot her in the back with a play arrow, and cursed her hideous form. Distraught and bawling, Manthara ran to her living quarters. Rama was awestruck. He had no idea his actions carried so much weight. Wrought with remorse, he swore to always show kindness to all beings, no matter how small or unimportant they may seem. Back in her room, Manthara's sadness had given way to rage. All her life, she had been treated poorly because of her form. Through no fault of her own she suffered. She decided to seek revenge upon all those who tormented her. She focused her thoughts on the little boy. Surely, as Dasaratha's favorite son, Rama would potentially inherit the throne. "Is there any justice in this world?!" wondered Manthara. Just then she remembered the words Kaikeyi had told her in confidence. As part of the marriage agreement, Dasaratha had secretly promised Kaikeyi that her son would succeed the throne. Only a handful of people were aware of the agreement. Manthara's mouth widened with a dark grin. Her plans for revenge were coming along nicely.
Author's Note: I spent a lot of time doing research trying to find out what the ancient palace inside Ayodhya might have looked like. I did numerous Google searches and Google image searches. The closest things I could find were the palaces in India that still exist today. Most of these were built around 1000 A.D. Rama, however, was believed to have been born in 7000 B.C.E. I then decided it would probably be a good idea to look at artistic renderings of the palace. I figured that surely Indian traditions (especially ones so religiously meaningful) were recorded and passed on. I used these images to describe the long decorated hallways that Manthara was walking through. Most of the content for the story was based on the Buck version of the Ramayana. After his exile, Rama instructs Lakshmana to be kind to every creature, no matter how small. He recalls the time he shot Manthara with the play arrow and realizes that this may have been the reason she harbored a hatred for him. I wrote a character essay for Manthara earlier. Unlike in that story, I wanted the reader to feel sympathy towards Manthara. I wanted to make the emotional motivations for her actions extremely clear.
courtesy - https://sites.google.com/site/ayodhyastorybook/home
comment:
p_commentcount