Absence of Chitrangada? - Page 3

Originally posted by: peridot.

They cannot not show Veda Vyasa. He was the one who fathered sons from both ambika and ambalika whether by natural means or some other high tech method is a mystery as Mahabharata is full of unnatural births.🤔

But i think they might mention that as that is the actual story.. .. And as of unnatural births its still a mystery😕😕

Originally posted by: bhas1066

@peridot
dont know. maybe we are not yet so advanced. but the closest i can come up with is biosynthetic robots or bionics as they are called. they are used for prosthetics mostly having all the functions of the human body.
i know its totally far fetched but maybe they has technology to reproduce a whole individual.

Possible but I guess it musnt have been too easy to carry out as we don't see many instances mentioned. Either our ancestors possessed remarkable know how or they were too imaginative.

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Chitrangada actually first became king after Shantanu's death, then died in battle w/ a Gandharva, and Vichitravirya succeeded him. He was not sick throughout his life - only after his marriage. 7 years after his marriage, he died, and then subsequent events followed.

They did mention about him. That king who held Vichitravirya mentioned about him

Y r they rushing through the epic?

Vichitraveerya died because he by birth a weak character and just got the kingdom because his more talented brother died early...