Posted:
Originally posted by: return_to_hades
Math:
l - l = H
8/2 = o
o + o = 8
c + c = o
c + c + c + c = 8
x/2 = v
l \ l = N
l + _ = T
And what exactly is that supposed to mean? I have a vague idea but I would like to hear it from you.
Originally posted by: return_to_hades
Math:
l - l = H
8/2 = o
o + o = 8
c + c = o
c + c + c + c = 8
x/2 = v
l \ l = N
l + _ = T
Originally posted by: Freethinker112
Many of the things reside in your brain. If you lose your memory, many of those things will be wiped out. But yeah, the consciousness will remain. The ability to think. And yes, I believe science will find about this one day. And if it happens in our life time, I will surely give you a heads up. 😉
Originally posted by: Freethinker112
And what exactly is that supposed to mean? I have a vague idea but I would like to hear it from you.
Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum
i dont know if it is expanding. For all the theory and suppositions i've read that says it is, i still find it mind-boggling. And i have precisely the questions you have as to what it might be expanding into. I've seen geometrical descriptions of it where it seems as if everything is on the surface of a balloon but that would still not answer the question.
Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum
regarding time travel, i'd answer that on 2 levels. First, i think it is illogical for an object to travel "back" in time. That would result in all kinds of retro results and would require us to surpass speed of light, which is a central tenet . Second, how can you travel in a time dimension? What specifically is the rate of change in a time dimension?
Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum
i really dont know what to accept- the theory that has supposedly been proven or the physical reality i perceive. Either way, the questions remain. Perhaps there is some other explanation for the background radiation etc and not necessarily the big bang one. Perhaps we have something else that solves out exactly the same way as the big bang but we dont know. For me, something makes sense if it can explain more than it glosses over. There are just too many questions that remain for me to say one way or the other. I know i am sounding like a layman but that's my honest reaction..but here's a question- if physicists really understand what they claim to know, how come they cant articulate it clearly? When someone cant articulate something clearly, especially if its in their chosen area of study, i often wonder if they really understand anything.
Originally posted by: return_to_hades
That I have nothing better to do and am just screwing around with nonsensical math.
What was your idea?
Originally posted by: Freethinker112
Something like that, that you would say just because it is maths it makes sense. 😆 Which individual statements does. 😉
Originally posted by: return_to_hades
Or logical statements that make perfect sense. If a glass is half empty, it is half full. So if a glass is fully empty, it is fully full.
Originally posted by: Freethinker112
Yes, it is expanding, many phenomenon are cause by it. And the balloon analogy is not 100% correct. When a balloon expands, it has space outside to expand into. But the 3D space can expand without being contained in a higher dimension.I replied to this before too. Why are you stuck onto the notion that time has to behave as spatial dimension? It is not a spatial dimension.Also, I posted the formula. Crossing C won't give you a negative term, rather an imaginary one. So, one won't be travelling back in time. Also, we are moving through time and can just slow it down by fast travel. And there is no problem of units. I have repeated this many times, time dimension is represented by ct, which on division by t leaves a dimension of velocity.
comment:
p_commentcount