If you believe in God, refute this! - Page 109

Originally posted by: K.Universe.

Unless we start looking at it all in terms of ripples / excitations / fluctuations in fields, we will be mired in scales that are mere abstractions of the real.

Fields extend throughout space. Fields contain energy.

At that point, it is a question of explaining how a field "feels" a force.

As some of you might already know, when we touch an object with our hands, it is in fact electrons of our hands and the electrons of the object that we are touching, repelling each other, and us "feeling" the object as a consequence.

In other words, it is fields interacting with each other but one field "feeling" the force of those interactions.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is what we need to understand. In any two interacting fields, why does one particular field "feel" the force?

@ Blue Bold: Gentlemen ...😛 ...May be that is why many refrained from answering ...😆 << Kidding .. 😆 ...But I would even if not too many might believe I fall in that category...The reason ? I suspect the Anti Particle level inside my brains has started to rise ...after reading all theories ...So I better answer before I energize ...😛

On a Serious not: Feeling ? as in ..The temperature ...Force ...and the other attributes of the object we touch? I believe it should be illusive ...And the death is when we stop feeling all illusions ..Cause if I touch a stone ..I would feel it .But I suspect the stone won't ..Cause it doesn't have the consciousness ...

Everything seems pretty illusive to me now ...Even the time ...Like its curved ..and we are traveling both Forward and backward in time ..Like that ONE ELECTRON in the Universe ..So if the time is circular the regression too won't be infinite ...And we ll reach the Big Bang phase again ...Which might mean even the time is either stationary ...or illusive ..😛 ..Nothing is happening nowhere ...We just feel it ..till the time of death ..Oh! and I guess the time slows with acceleration / gravity ..( Relatively .. Gravitational Time Dilation ...)

The point is this illusion ..may be a product of pure energy ..separate from all mass...Which parts us at the time of death ...Or may be nothing of what I have written here is true ...😆 ..Both everything and Nothing is possible ..

Thank you .. 😆

Vintu ...😛

PS : Ignore if you find it trivial..😆

Originally posted by: K.Universe.

Unless we start looking at it all in terms of ripples / excitations / fluctuations in fields, we will be mired in scales that are mere abstractions of the real.

Fields extend throughout space. Fields contain energy.

At that point, it is a question of explaining how a field "feels" a force.

As some of you might already know, when we touch an object with our hands, it is in fact electrons of our hands and the electrons of the object that we are touching, repelling each other, and us "feeling" the object as a consequence.

In other words, it is fields interacting with each other but one field "feeling" the force of those interactions.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is what we need to understand. In any two interacting fields, why does one particular field "feel" the force?

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

i think conservation of momentum and energy still apply. These are preserved as we go from first particle to field and on to 2nd particle. In quantum field theory, i think the forces between 2 particles ultimately have other particles in between acting as intermediaries- photons? But i think you were talking fields in general.

i am not sure however why we are getting so technical. "Whatever" it is, field/ particle/ energy, what created it? Or did it not need creation? And when i say "it", i mean "all of it". We can go on with discussion about how 1 particle creates/ transmutes into another based on conservation principles. But what's more relevant imo when we are looking for first origins is what created it all. In that vein, i find theories that talk about space creating matter/ anti-matter pretty interesting...

Reason I brought up the subject of fields was to "resolve" electron indistinguishability.

And, as an afterthought, I wanted to emphasize the importance of fields from the point of view of disturbances happening in those fields; these disturbances are nothing but "virtual particles". Your statement about empty space creating matter / anti-matter of course deals with these very disturbances that I was talking about!

To understand "real particles" we need to understand why the vacuum state is unstable enough to produce these disturbances ("virtual particles"). These form the bridge between the "something" that is the physical universe and the "nothing" that is the vacuum (free space). To get to "nothing", the disturbances in fields have to be fleshed out.

Yeah and there is this another something that baffles me further. The farthest known Galaxy is some 13.23 Billion Light Years away ...Now if its the same cute electron that creates an illusion of the matter there and even here where we are ...ie : Velocity = Infinite m /s ... How could the Electron still have Mass ?

The Charge / Mass (ratio) of electron is known ..and I guess nothing that travels @ 'C' should have any mass at rest ..( like Photons ..If I'm not mistaken...) So how the heck can this electron traveling at many ..in fact infinite times faster than 'C' have any mass ? ...😛

Vintu ..

Originally posted by: Vintage.Wine

Yeah and there is this another something that baffles me further. The farthest known Galaxy is some 13.23 Billion Light Years away ...Now if its the same cute electron that creates an illusion of the matter there and even here where we are ...ie : Velocity = Infinite m /s ... How could the Electron still have Mass ?

The Charge / Mass (ratio) of electron is known ..and I guess nothing that travels @ 'C' should have any mass at rest ..( like Photons ..If I'm not mistaken...) So how the heck can this electron traveling at many ..in fact infinite times faster than 'C' have any mass ? ...😛

Vintu ..

Wheeler was admittedly semi serious about that one electron hypothesis. No way should it be construed as a valid theory, according to Wheeler himself.

To your question: what we are seeing now as being 13.23 billion light years away, as you know, existed 13.23 billion years ago. In other words, we are not measuring that galaxy now. We are only measuring the light reaching us now. So, even if it were the same electron, it is still stuck in time (world-lines?) so we are not seeing one electron here and ANOTHER electron far away. It could still be the same electron. Not saying it is, but doesn't violate that one electron hypothesis based on the condition that you set up, IMO. As a field, however, it extends throughout space.

Originally posted by: K.Universe.

Wheeler was admittedly semi serious about that one electron hypothesis. No way should it be construed as a valid theory, according to Wheeler himself.

To your question: what we are seeing now as being 13.23 billion light years away, as you know, existed 13.23 billion years ago. In other words, we are not measuring that galaxy now. We are only measuring the light reaching us now. So, even if it were the same electron, it is still stuck in time (world-lines?) so we are not seeing one electron here and ANOTHER electron far away. It could still be the same electron. Not saying it is, but doesn't violate that one electron hypothesis based on the condition that you set up, IMO. As a field, however, it extends throughout space.

@ Bold: True that ...But a bit of a change might help invalidate the hypothesis 😛 ... Why not reduce the observation radius and make that consistent with the earth's age? .. Say The Alpha Centauri system ...😊

So obviously what we are seeing now is the image of 4.36 years ago ...Which means the Alpha Centauri system existed 4.36 years ago. ...But we know that earth too existed 4.36 years ago ( At the same time) ...Which means both the systems existed at that same point in time ..So if it was to be one electron ...It should have been present at both places at the same time ...And as the distance between the two suggests the electron must have moved much faster than the speed of the light ...ie : @ infinite velocity ...

And any speed > / = C would challenge the electron's basic nature ..and won't allow it to bear the mass anymore ...

Vintu ...😛

Guys, I have found the answer to your question.

Originally posted by: Summer3

So have we found GOD ? We're running out of pages ! 😆

Summer ...😛

But we are getting there 😊 ...The Index Page says The God is on Page # Infinity ...😛 ...Let's pat each other's back for moving 141 pages closer to finding him ..😆

Cheers !

Vintu ... 😛

Originally posted by: Vintage.Wine

Summer ...😛

But we are getting there 😊 ...The Index Page says The God is on Page # Infinity ...😛 ...Let's pat each other's back for moving 141 pages closer to finding him ..😆

Cheers !

Vintu ... 😛

Yes Vintu Bhai congrats , let us leave no stones unturned.