Originally posted by: zainab25
This show should have gone off air....uhh, 2.5 years back? All words to describe it post the initial 6 months of DMG would be an understatement.
Originally posted by: zainab25
This show should have gone off air....uhh, 2.5 years back? All words to describe it post the initial 6 months of DMG would be an understatement.
they were dependend on AR for trp from the first day of season2................Originally posted by: RehanSinha_XR
I have heard people saying that TRPs increased after KSG came back..Perhaps...But what difference does it make to the viewers..Surely, we have not invested money in the show...So why are we bothered with TRPs...We as viewers are interested in a good show, a good story...And to be very frank and with all due respect to KSG fans, the story hasn't moved an inch ever since KSG returned...DMG, which was suppose to be a show abt the docs of Sanjeevani was reduced to a melodramatic and boring saga after KSG returned...All other character lost importance and the Season 2 leads became Sidies and left one by one after KSG returned....His return, as I find, actually was a death knell to the show...The show lost its flavor...All forums have become war-zone and ppl are endlessly fighting over this AR-SR stuff....So now tell me guys, wouldn't it been better if the Season 2 had proceeded at its own pace with the new characters???
u luved it but most of the viewers didn't and that trp(crap as per u) is the proof for thatOriginally posted by: RehanSinha_XR
@ Devilseye....Again you are giving me the same old TRP crap...Don't u understand...I am a viewer...What will I do with TRPs if there is no good story??? I loved SR bcoz I found a new unique story in them...Not like usual lovey dovey girly romantic tales...But after KSG came back, the story became stagnant...It was always the same melodrama...And to reiterate myself, I am not interested in TRPs, bcoz thats not my business....
Originally posted by: devilseye99
u luved it but most of the viewers didn't and that trp(crap as per u) is the proof for that
comment:
p_commentcount