Originally posted by: aaf311
Ahhh Yes, that's true. Gift-giving does matter a lot. Not married either, but just that entire idea of never going to someone's house empty-handed is proof of that. Makes sense, makes sense
But a lot of it also equates down to trust. Maybe Badima herself didn't trust the groom's family (and she maybe right not to, seeing as one of those necklaces was blackened), but doesn't she trust her husband? I'm sure Manikant would've done the bg check and ensured his daughter would be entering a stable, secure household.
I guess, in a way, checking the jewellery is justified. But it could have been done later as well. There was no need to do it when a wedding ceremony was about to happen.
Yes, exactly. Her behaviour was proof that neither did she care about her family's izzat, nor the Mehta family's. To break off a wedding at the mandap causes a lot of talk in society, especially against the girl.
Garv ka toh matlab kya hi bolu. On the one hand, yes, as a lawyer, he should've kept calm and dealt with things. But maybe as a son? Would a son have kept his cool if his mother was being insulted in front of who knows how many people?
comment:
p_commentcount