Originally posted by: padmalaya30
let us keep this forum active even after PV
I dont like indulging in fight
Originally posted by: padmalaya30
let us keep this forum active even after PV
I dont like indulging in fight
Originally posted by: shruthiravi
Wanted to share something interesting with you on Ramayan. I had studied a poem called Panchavati by Maithili Sharan Gupt for my Visharad second part ( It is a course of Dakshin Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha). So the poem deals with Ram, Sita, Lakshman life in Panchavati and ends with the nose cutting of surpi. We had to study poetic analysis as well as character analysis for exam. There were guides and all for us to support our writing. As usual I found Ram and Sita too ideal and prepared myself to write about Lakshman and Surpi. For the exam choice was between Sita and Surpi and I wrote surpi. I wrote it quite well.
So for this exam we had viva voce also. So when I went for viva voce that lady asked which character analysis I did for Panchavati. I told Surpi. That teacher asked why Surpi when there was Sita. I told if it is Sita you have to write lot of good things and it was really boring ππ to write about her. Whereas Surpi had so many shades and it was fun to write about her. As I explained Surpi based on that poem that teacher became wide eyed. When I think back I am thankful she didnt lose conscious the way I was talking about Surpi as Surpi was my childhood friendππ.That was another thing I liked about SKR. They didnt make Sita linear. Mahanta ki moorat. She was human with human emotions and could connect to her more.
Originally posted by: shruthiravi
@aditi I have removed the member name. But you have copied my post, so do change it there also. π.
I have always answered if the question is valid and if somebody gave good suggestion/criticism on my analysis style I have changed it. Couple of my regular readers have pointed out the flaws including yourself, I had changed it.Sometimes you get attached to a character. Not that you love or agree to everything that character does, but it is the character that holds you. Every analyst will have it, as we are also humans.In SKR, Shanta had held me, it was such a small role but everyone knows here she mattered to me a lot.Also I sit with questions, if the script answers the question or goes in the direction of answering the question I feel happy.In SKR the question was on Sita banishment. Why did Ram who is Lord Narayan incarnate did injustice to a woman. If it is not injustice what was the motive. What is Vishnu Maya hiding. SKR exposed Vishnu Maya. They connected it well with Shanta and in Lanka kand itself I understood that injustice to Sita was to get justice for his sister, his mother and other women of Ayodhya. Remember I telling when Surpi tells to Ravan " Bhaiyya I know you will bring justice for me", it was like Shanta telling Ram. " Bhaiyya I knew you will bring justice for me". Ravan took the justice destroying another family( yes his family too got destroyed, but he inflicted the pain on others first than self) , while Ram gave justice almost destroying his family, taking the extreme pain inflicting upon himself. That was the difference between two.In Paramatma Shri Krishna I simply enjoy the narration of Vishnu-Lakshmi. it is penned beautiful with its mystery, philosophy and spirituality.Similarly in Beyhadh I love Maya, I love analyzing her thoughts, her emotions. What drives her to do such actions. Telling why she does that, and justifying her actions are two different things. If you sit for an exam and if Maya comes for character analysis and if you bash the character, you wont get marks. Similarly a story situation, character has to be analyzed for what they are, their rights and their wrongs. That is where you score marks. People who have written language papers will know that( But you have to write your POV, not the copied POV of someone else which many do reading guides and all to pass exam). I still remember my Hindi Sir asking me whether he can keep my answer sheets for model exam for my plus 2, for the character analysis I had written for Prithviraj Chouhan. I still remember the concluding line of that analysis. If Prithiviraj chouhan was not magnanimous enough to forgive Mohammed Gori when he got the chance to kill him, history of India would have been different. Ethics, kindness were Prithviraj chouchan's strength, but the same strength took his life and also gave his land in the hands of intruders.My language books since high school have always ended up with teachers as they told they would prefer to use them for the next set of students. There was a time I could write in all the 3 languages Hindi, English and Malayalam quite well. But then not using the other 2 languages for writing over a period of time, the vocabulary of expression in those language got reduced and now I can write only in English well.When I read books I love characters. In Ramayana my favorite always has been Lakshman and Urmila then Indrajith and Hanuman. In MB it was Krishna, Karna, Arjuna, Panchali and then Abhimanyu.In Harry Potter it was hermoine I loved the most and then Snape. Snape was one hell of a character sketch by JK Rowling.In Bahubali of course it was Shivgami followed by Devasena.it was the first time in SKR I analyzed Sita and Ram in depth. I am really thankful to script writers for writing the script so beautifully in SKR to hook me to Ram and yes Ashish delivered completely on that script. The eyes of Ram with that slight glistening he did so remarkably. I cannot praise him enough for that. Even my mom tells now if someone tells Ram it is Ashish face that is coming to her mindπ.
Just tell me the meaning of the titleI don't mean the literal meaning
In mean whose love was "Rab Se Sona"?Offcourse for us it was Ranveer'sI want to know the maker's takeππ
comment:
p_commentcount