I hope you will read this and will give me your precious opinions!
do you think the ten avatarm or ten incarnations of vishnudev told in poorans is absolute and ordered chronologically? and more importantly the story of varah and bhu devi is related to the story of narakashura according to bhagabata pooran, and thus it is somehow related with the story of krishna's so called 16000 wives , all of whose are told to be the daughters of narak!
according to poorans the story of narakasura goes in the way-----
once narakasura became very powerful due to boons from mahadev and later on brahma ji. he managed to overpower devas and snatched the ear-ring of devmata aditi and brought it to his kingdom, pragyotish (present kamarupa). devraj could not make a way to bring it back and he along with devas went to dwarika (an island state where krishna and other yadavs resided) and complained of him to Krishna! Lord krishna decided to do something to preserve the honor of the devas and he attacked naraka's kingdom along with his wife satyabhaama. with the help of his wife, krishna was successful in killing the demon and recover the jewelry when the earth Goddess appeared before him and returned it to him. The earth Goddess told him that when he took the form of Varah to lift the world above the water(!) with its horn, then with his touch the bhoomi became pregnant and gave birth to Naraka(!).
this was the story so far according to vagabata. but there is something more horrible in brahmabaibart puran. it says
krishna conquered pragyotish and captured all the women of the kingdom. he took all the daughters of naraka, 16000 written. and married them when he took all of them somewhere underground.
now from vishnu puran
Now I have some serious arguments to accept the existance of naraka and that hell of 16000 wives of krishna--
1. according to mahabharata, during the time of krishna naraka was not the king of pragyotish. Vagadutta was the king of pragyotish who was killed by arjuna on the epic battle; so how does it become possible that naraka even could have existed on the same empire
3. now the existence of 16000 daugthers of naraka seems to be impossible if considered the human birth cycle and the same for krishna's 180000 sons from those wives because with this if considered true then we have to accept that krishna had the birth of 4 sons each and everyday!!!! seems father of all logics!!
thus i don't think the story of ten incarnations are some mismatches in them, somewhere the logic combining them seems to be self contradictory!
comment:
p_commentcount