Okay so looks like ypm are confused between atigin and altunia coz they had the same first name i.e ikhtiyar ud din and they were close friends, atigin was an usurper π he wanted to achieve alot then he had and so he had filled Altunia's mind with poison
Secondly yaqut was a mere nobody the two volume long history book had just 2-3 lines mention of his that too only bcoz of the stupid controversy.
The author says he was the superintendent of the stables and the fact that he was made amir of amirs is most likely a false claim bcoz that title didn't exist in that time it came into being in Akbar's time that means 16 century, but the turks were jealous of even the stables part coz only a turk was appointed to that position.
More over the nonsense about him lifting razia by armpits to help her sit on horse is again false coz that was not definitely the way even if he had she might have just leaned on his back like he became the stool for her to help climb or maybe gave his hand for her to step on but again she never rode a horse when she went out she always rode an elephant. Even an English historian quotes that the princess's name is merely defamed by joining her name with yaqut
Also she started dressing as men almost near the end of her period π
She was the eldest of iltutmish's childrenπ²
A fact about ruknuddin is that he was very generous a person so much that the author compares him with hatim taiπ² it was turkan who was pure evilπ
Altunia's part i will write wait for itπ
comment:
p_commentcount