Nasir was Malik-us-Sharq

overactor thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#1
(Lord of the East) 😆 he was the governor of Bengal 🤔 and died after one year of his rule🤔 is this the right info?

Created

Last reply

Replies

2

Views

1k

Users

2

Likes

1

Frequent Posters

702755 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#2
Yes, he was Malik-us-Sharq but he soon died after he suppressed rebellion in Bengal. But he won't die till he produce a son. His son will be named after him and he will become the last ruler of Slave dyansty of Iltutmish.
overactor thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: Roxelana

Yes, he was Malik-us-Sharq but he soon died after he suppressed rebellion in Bengal. But he won't die till he produce a son. His son will be named after him and he will become the last ruler of Slave dyansty of Iltutmish.

His son would succeed ala ud din right who was the son of ruknuddin😆
Top