Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Love CC#10/DT Nt Pg#41 - Page 11

1. Everything can and should be questioned, including God. I think, therefore I am. Otherwise, it's just blind belief.

2. Books can't be questioned? Of course they can be. But even if you decide they can't be, then you're actually proving my point. 3 primary Krishna texts corroborate what I said.

I get a little dizzy when people quote Brahmavaivarta Purana at me for Radha. That actually says Draupadi was Radha. Is that truly the text anyone wants to quote?

Chapter 126

О dear, you are Radhika in the Goloka, you

are the same in Gokula. You happen to be

Mahalaksmi and Sarasvatl of the Vaikuntha. You

happen to be the MartyalaksmI in the ocean of

milk. You are the daughter-in-law of Dharma

and appear in the form of Laksml with peaceful

form

You happen to be the chaste Bharat!, the

dearest wife of the sage Kapila in the land of

Bharata. You are the one known as Sita in

Mithila. you happen to be shadow of the chaste

DraupadI, you also appear in the form of

Mahalaksmi in Dvaraka and RukminI as well.

DraupadI who was bom of your ray became the

spouse of the Pandavas

_________

Anyway, I said this only because my freedom to state my thoughts were questioned. Faith is such that if she exists for you, she exists. Like Gita says, a man is what he believes.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

1. Everything can and should be questioned, including God. I think, therefore I am. Otherwise, it's just blind belief.

2. Books can't be questioned? Of course they can be. But even if you decide they can't be, then you're actually proving my point. 3 primary Krishna texts corroborate what I said.

I get a little dizzy when people quote Brahmavaivarta Purana at me for Radha. That actually says Draupadi was Radha. Is that truly the text anyone wants to quote?

Chapter 126

О dear, you are Radhika in the Goloka, you

are the same in Gokula. You happen to be

Mahalaksmi and Sarasvatl of the Vaikuntha. You

happen to be the MartyalaksmI in the ocean of

milk. You are the daughter-in-law of Dharma

and appear in the form of Laksml with peaceful

form

You happen to be the chaste Bharat!, the

dearest wife of the sage Kapila in the land of

Bharata. You are the one known as Sita in

Mithila. you happen to be shadow of the chaste

DraupadI, you also appear in the form of

Mahalaksmi in Dvaraka and RukminI as well.

DraupadI who was bom of your ray became the

spouse of the Pandavas

_________

Anyway, I said this only because my freedom to state my thoughts were questioned. Faith is such that if she exists for you, she exists. Like Gita says, a man is what he believes.

ShriRadha is Golokeswari yes in many hidden text it's written.But diff sectors belief diff things..If we go to Barsana and vrindavan there are proof on belief to it.Radha is lakshmi incarnation..

I respect same.and I m not into Questioning God .I neve read about brahmavivartapurana.

End point is any purana we can't say it's correct or its wrong..God some blindly believe Bhagvatam but I ll truely say our heart if pure God resides on it

Swastika rk is above imagination which Definitely irritated me

https://m.timesofindia.com/astrology/religious-places/mysterious-facts-about-nidhivan-temple/amp_articleshow/68206141.cms

This is trusted times of india article about nidhivan rk raas.. please all read

Wishing all my friends a very joyous and safe new year!! Take care and be safe people!!

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

1. Everything can and should be questioned, including God. I think, therefore I am. Otherwise, it's just blind belief.

2. Books can't be questioned? Of course they can be. But even if you decide they can't be, then you're actually proving my point. 3 primary Krishna texts corroborate what I said.

I get a little dizzy when people quote Brahmavaivarta Purana at me for Radha. That actually says Draupadi was Radha. Is that truly the text anyone wants to quote?

Chapter 126

О dear, you are Radhika in the Goloka, you

are the same in Gokula. You happen to be

Mahalaksmi and Sarasvatl of the Vaikuntha. You

happen to be the MartyalaksmI in the ocean of

milk. You are the daughter-in-law of Dharma

and appear in the form of Laksml with peaceful

form

You happen to be the chaste Bharat!, the

dearest wife of the sage Kapila in the land of

Bharata. You are the one known as Sita in

Mithila. you happen to be shadow of the chaste

DraupadI, you also appear in the form of

Mahalaksmi in Dvaraka and RukminI as well.

DraupadI who was bom of your ray became the

spouse of the Pandavas

_________

Anyway, I said this only because my freedom to state my thoughts were questioned. Faith is such that if she exists for you, she exists. Like Gita says, a man is what he believes.

Appreciate the fact that books indeed can be questioned. One primary outcome.of that is, it enables us to read more, gain more curiosity, question more, find or research more parallels. I myself read a lot and ques many things that makes me look for more info. So I will definitely encourage that!!

Hey guys, happy new year to all! Main phir aa gayi bhoot ki tarah! 😆

Waise, I just watched this AMAZING performance by Sri Parshwanath Upadhye of Arjuna, if you have time do check it out...it's truly amazing!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JaQaLfp-12M&feature=youtu.be

It'll be available on YT only for the next 48 hours. ❤️

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

1. Everything can and should be questioned, including God. I think, therefore I am. Otherwise, it's just blind belief.

2. Books can't be questioned? Of course they can be. But even if you decide they can't be, then you're actually proving my point. 3 primary Krishna texts corroborate what I said.

I get a little dizzy when people quote Brahmavaivarta Purana at me for Radha. That actually says Draupadi was Radha. Is that truly the text anyone wants to quote?

Chapter 126

О dear, you are Radhika in the Goloka, you

are the same in Gokula. You happen to be

Mahalaksmi and Sarasvatl of the Vaikuntha. You

happen to be the MartyalaksmI in the ocean of

milk. You are the daughter-in-law of Dharma

and appear in the form of Laksml with peaceful

form

You happen to be the chaste Bharat!, the

dearest wife of the sage Kapila in the land of

Bharata. You are the one known as Sita in

Mithila. you happen to be shadow of the chaste

DraupadI, you also appear in the form of

Mahalaksmi in Dvaraka and RukminI as well.

DraupadI who was bom of your ray became the

spouse of the Pandavas

_________

Anyway, I said this only because my freedom to state my thoughts were questioned. Faith is such that if she exists for you, she exists. Like Gita says, a man is what he believes.

I think this is what the quoted text means:

In Brahmavaivarta Purana, Krishna-Radha are considered the supreme god and goddess. So all other goddesses are thought of as manifestation of Radha. I think any Purana honouring a particular deity does that. So Draupadi, who is considered sometimes as an incarnation of Laxmi, is being considered a manifestation of Radha (of Goloka).

But why did Samb attack Jamvanti? I thought he became tiger to attack Radha

About Krishna well to his justification he never wanted to marry any of his wives all of them literally forced him to marry them so He can openly tell them that he doesn't love them and will never love them

Originally posted by: vyapti

I think this is what the quoted text means:

In Brahmavaivarta Purana, Krishna-Radha are considered the supreme god and goddess. So all other goddesses are thought of as manifestation of Radha. I think any Purana honouring a particular deity does that. So Draupadi, who is considered sometimes as an incarnation of Laxmi, is being considered a manifestation of Radha (of Goloka).

Nah. The text is pretty clear throughout Draupadi is Lakshmi as per them.

For the record, the whole purana seems to be Krishna fan fiction. All tridevi are in love with him in it. 😆

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

But why did Samb attack Jamvanti? I thought he became tiger to attack Radha

About Krishna well to his justification he never wanted to marry any of his wives all of them literally forced him to marry them so He can openly tell them that he doesn't love them and will never love them

They made him attack Jambhavati so that Krishna can give her gyaan that she made her son a spoilt evil brat who will attack even his own mom for no reason. 😂

Regarding your second paragraph, yeah u do have a point. As per ITV standards, Krishna had 'majboori marriages' even though he had this big wide smile on his face whenever he was marrying his wives. 😁