Posted:
Kind of having doubt for sometime...but how confirm hogaya..rk script writer ka dimag poori taraf thoothgaya..
It's zoo week in rk
Kind of having doubt for sometime...but how confirm hogaya..rk script writer ka dimag poori taraf thoothgaya..
It's zoo week in rk
I'm convinced these people hate Krishna 🤬. Forget a husband. Someone is asking for help in life-threatening danger. If you're scared, fine, you run off. Here, he is not scared. He's telling her you'll die if someone else won't give up their life for you. He is coolly watching it happen. Imagine that!
On top of it, a husband is telling a wife she will never be equal to the girlfriend. Even if he felt it, why would he deliberately hurt someone that way?
They're making Krishna look like a selfish, arrogant, sadistic you-know-what.
At this point, I want Samba to win, then him to die.
(I haven't watched. Going by the precap summaries)
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
I'm convinced these people hate Krishna 🤬. Forget a husband. Someone is asking for help in life-threatening danger. If you're scared, fine, you run off. Here, he is not scared. He's telling her you'll die if someone else won't give up their life for you. He is coolly watching it happen. Imagine that!
On top of it, a husband is telling a wife she will never be equal to the girlfriend. Even if he felt it, why would he deliberately hurt someone that way?
They're making Krishna look like a selfish, arrogant, sadistic you-know-what.
At this point, I want Samba to win, then him to die.
(I haven't watched. Going by the precap summaries)
But onepoint I like to mention here.
Whatever u said about swastika krishna is right.If he is committed to his gf he must not marry at all.
But Samba action can't be justified...he can't ruin the people for his personal issue with his father
I saw today's episode on IG. The entire episode was about how mahaan Radha is and how superior is her love for Krishna, more superior than even Krishna's wives love for him. I find this comparison and Krishna telling Jambhavati, your love for me is not as true as Radha's is utter nonsense. This show literally insults Krishna's wives love and devotion for him. Krishna spends all the time with his girlfriend and then tells one of his wives, your love for me is bullshit. Wow!
This show writers are actually making it look like Krishna had extra marital affair with Radha and he was a typical MCP who treated his wives as doormats. I seriously feel mythos should be banned from itv because people just don't know how to make a good mythological show without degrading God/Goddess/anyone
Now I am having doubt...all 8 asta bharya of krishna in reality I mean 8 main wive are ashthalakshmi right
Originally posted by: Life_Is_Dutiful
I saw today's episode on IG. The entire episode was about how mahaan Radha is and how superior is her love for Krishna, more superior than even Krishna's wives love for him. I find this comparison and Krishna telling Jambhavati, your love for me is not as true as Radha's is utter nonsense. This show literally insults Krishna's wives love and devotion for him. Krishna spends all the time with his girlfriend and then tells one of his wives, your love for me is bullshit. Wow!
This show writers are actually making it look like Krishna had extra marital affair with Radha and he was a typical MCP who treated his wives as doormats. I seriously feel mythos should be banned from itv because people just don't know how to make a good mythological show without degrading God/Goddess/anyone
See, i don't mind her love for him being greater. People are diff, so they have diff capacities to love. People also relate differently to each other.
I don't believe Radha existed, but if she did, they had an equation starting from childhood. They also related as equals according to Jayadeva. That's a huge deal.
My problem is with Krishna telling Jambavati that she doesn't come close and the show somehow justifying the behavior! They're not showing him conflicted about competing loyalties. They're making him a nasty, uncaring character.
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
See, i don't mind her love for him being greater. People are diff, so they have diff capacities to love. People also relate differently to each other.
I don't believe Radha existed, but if she did, they had an equation starting from childhood. They also related as equals according to Jayadeva. That's a huge deal.
My problem is with Krishna telling Jambavati that she doesn't come close and the show somehow justifying the behavior! They're not showing him conflicted about competing loyalties. They're making him a nasty, uncaring character.
Sorry to reply this..But I want to make a point here.each one has diff believe I understand..But point is it's not Jayadev alone Radha was mentioned hence ... Definitely Radha love is great in reality for the sacrifice she has done..To believe it or not is ones mindset and their Custom.But if we keep saying only Jayadeva written imaginary vision on Shriradha we are wrong and if we say it is fake means Bhagvatam has to be fake too.if one belief is Shriradha doesn't understand hurting other statement must be taken care is my point..we have rights to talk anything about swastika rk and not about books and existence which many dunno.
Next is Krishna in reality never showed any discrimination or equality basis to Radha or any of his wife.This really is fake as all purana has said , Radha krishna relationship only upto krishna before leaving mathura..It's no Radha in dwarka.Just for marketing and money purpose it was loosely and dragging purpose it's shown as Rk basis.For this makers must have kept some other name and not RK
Originally posted by: Sweetypie34
Sorry to reply this..But I want to make a point here.each one has diff believe I understand..But point is it's not Jayadev alone Radha was mentioned hence ... Definitely Radha love is great in reality for the sacrifice she has done.They are proof which was shown already some weeks back here itself..To believe it or not is ones maturity and their Custom.But if we keep saying only Jayadeva written imaginary vision on Shriradha we are wrong and if we say it is fake means Bhagvatam has to be fake too.if one belief is Shriradha doesn't understand hurting other statement must be taken care is my point..we have rights to talk anything about swastika rk and not about books which many dunno.
The reason I don't believe she existed is precisely because Bhagavatham/MBh/Harivamsa don't mention Radha.
The puranas which mention Radha are all dated to same era as Gita Govindam.
Faith is faith. I respect that. But faith cannot demand other people believe the same.
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
The reason I don't believe she existed is precisely because Bhagavatham/MBh/Harivamsa don't mention Radha.
The puranas which mention Radha are all dated to same era as Gita Govindam.
Faith is faith. I respect that. But faith cannot demand other people believe the same.
also u can see in Vishnu sahasranam it's only Rukmini satyabhama mentioned..so should we say all other krishna wife are fake ?Shri Radha by respect to say she had affair with krishna so it was not written .Ones faith and their beliefs from their scriptures , books can't be questioned and making statement from it repeatedly can't be encouraged
But coming to this serial I seriously discourage the way of portraying lord krishna.. Krishna thoughts , techniques is for our generation which was wrongly portrayed in this serial
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
The reason I don't believe she existed is precisely because Bhagavatham/MBh/Harivamsa don't mention Radha.
The puranas which mention Radha are all dated to same era as Gita Govindam.
Faith is faith. I respect that. But faith cannot demand other people believe the same.
I never told or force to believe it but making statement again and again samething is the way of forcing our point.i never told anyone to demand to belief my belief..
comment:
p_commentcount