Another track that doesn't make any sense.
What if they don't take the market challenge ?
----> Krishna gets killed.
Therefore, Nand aka Krishna's father joins team 'get Krishna killed'. Krishna himself is asked to do the same and he obliges.
What if men don't support the challenge and women alone participate and lose ?
----> The probability of success is reduced to half. Kans still counts it as 'challenge accepted by Barsana wasis' and kills the prisoners.
What if men participate along with the women ?
----> Probability of success is improved.
So what do the men including Nandbaba do ?
-------YES !! They join team 'kill Krishna' and don't help their better halves in the challenge.
You ask why ? Because the makers are feminists yo !!!!
Edit:
Actually there is a theory------ imagine you are driving a train that leads to two tracks---- one kills someone you love and the another kills 10 strangers. Your train has no brakes. Which track would you choose ? This dilemma is a chapter in ethics studies. This could have led to a more meaningful storyline with much more depth. The situation is same here-----specially for Nandbaba and Radha (life of Krishna vs half of the villagers). Even that could have drawn a parallel to Ramayana regarding Rama's dilemma in the Sita vs villagers scenario. I wish this track would have led to something like this and not just a mere gender war. But now as Kans would kill the villagers either way, there's no dilemma, the men being in separate team won't give any positive outcome and nothing makes sense.
comment:
p_commentcount