Radha Krishn- EDT & The Epic based Doubts/ Discussions - Page 58

Created

Last reply

Replies

577

Views

58k

Users

21

Likes

912

Frequent Posters

624284 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: RainFire125

what the b******** are they showing these days???????? And how in heavens in this in any angle punarmilan??????????????? All these creatives need to be put in a mental asylum i think :( :(


First of àll they are irritating by dragging Radha in every matter and Krishna wants her in the dwarka court ..this is too much and top of it to show rk as mahan they made Jambavathi as evil.punar milan they won't show so easily..Mixing all puranas and building unwanted stories...and committing it

Swetha-Sai thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Very interesting topic discussed here, Radha prompting Krishna to save Yajnaseni in the royal court! What?

Draupadi was the mysterious, fiery yet compassionate queen of the five Pandava brothers, and is also considered as the sole reason behind the great Mahabharat war!! But as a woman with sacred and Divine powers, Draupadi symbolizes the binding of the five chakras in the human body!! She is thus referred to as Kula Kundalini, which is an unconquerable power by any mere human.

Rare in the culture of ancient times, Draupadi was a fearless woman. She demanded justice directly from Dhritarashtra, the king of Hastinapur when she was insulted. She, as Sairandhri, again demanded justice directly from king Virata when she was insulted by his brother-in-law Kichaka. She openly condemned those kings (Virata and Dhritarashtra) for failing to protect a woman. She even condemned great warriors such as Bhishma, Drona, Kripacharya, and her husbands for not saving her from the humiliation during the Cheer-Haran episode.

It is said that when Duryodhana and Dushasana subjected the Pandava princes' wife Draupadi to an attempt at disrobing her, she prayed to her Sakha, her brother Krishna. Then Krishna sent immeasurable reams of cloth to keep Draupadi covered, thus defeating the evil and nefarious designs of the Kaurava princes.

There are many reasons for Krishna's divine intervention.

And there are other stories too to prove the good nature of Samrajni Draupadi!

According to Vyasa's description in Mahabharata, it's Draupadi's Dharma that saved her from the shame of being disrobed?!!

In Shiva Purana, it's stated that sage Durvasa gave a boon to Draupadi that saved her from being disrobed?!! Durvasa never had a history of saving someone, but it was mentioned in Shiv Purana that he pleased for the help of Panchali and blessed her with a boon!

Two different stories are in vogue. One - once while Sage Durvasa was taking bath in the river Ganga, his garment was washed away and, Draupadi who was there, then tore a portion of her clothing and gave that to him. Durvasa then blessed her that in critical times this generous act would come to her rescue.

Another - During Sri Krishna's visit to Indraprastha, He injured his fingers. She tore a piece from her upper cloth and tied that to Sri Krishna's finger to arrest the flow of blood. In return for that virtuous act, she was saved from humiliation.


Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Well... well, well said, agreed with your every point.

The Mahabharata is considered to be an authority in matters of State, government, polity, and philosophy. Even though it was written centuries ago, the political conflicts described therein resonate strongly with the events of today! There are numerous interpretations of the epic and the events that led to the Great War of Mahabharatha, but there is one particular incident that it is agreed proved to be the final blow in the rivalry between the Kauravas and the Pandavas -- the attempted disrobing of Draupadi.

When Draupadi protested against her disrobing by asking the Kauravas if it was Dharma to treat a woman in such a manner, Karna, a Kaurava ally, retorted that if a man loses himself in gambling, his master becomes the master of all his possessions, including his wife. He further told her that the ancient laws allowed a woman to go to only with four men with her husband's permission. Since Draupadi had been with five men, he said, she was a whore and public property, according to law. Hence, her disrobing was justified as it fell well within the bounds of law-- said by Karna!!

There is no shortage of dilemmas in the Mahābhārata, however, one exceptional dilemma remains unresolved, a question unanswered even today. Did Yudhiṣṭhira have the right to stake Draupadī in the “friendly" game of dice after he had lost himself? And was she, therefore, slave to the Kauravas? No one resolved this dilemma presented in the earliest instance of the dice game!

Criticism of Yudhiṣṭhira’s addiction, the silence or equivocation of the Kuru elders in the sabha and the inaction of Draupadī’s husbands at her ill-treatment causes indignation, but the censure is barely commensurate with the burden of guilt they might bear.

What factors facilitated the staking of Draupadī, her proposed slave status, and subsequent mistreatment? Namely, Yudhiṣṭhira’s failure as a husband, the inaction of the Kuru elders, the impotence of her husbands and the absence of Kṛṣṇa and Vyāsa from the scene.

Draupadī posed the ultimate dharmasaṅkaṭa issuing from the treatment of a lawfully wedded wife. Yudhiṣṭhira—authority on dhārma, son of Dharma—responds to his wife’s question in the gambling hall with catatonic silence. He says nothing, good or bad!!!

Once she is lost in the game of dice , Duryodhana immediately asks for her to be brought and wishes her to be with the serving girls and sweep the chamber.

Her first reaction is disbelief that her husband, a king no less, can stake his wife and she says Yudhiṣṭhira must have been stupefied in his intoxication for the game

Ancient Indian literature, epics especially, abound with karmic consequences to explain the inexplicable. Sometimes, events are a result of actions from a previous birth, and sometimes in this very birth, but unknown to the protagonist or observer. Often, it is the curse of an irate sage.

The entire Mahabharaths is a political commentary on Kings and their ambitions, Kingdoms and boundaries, women as a showpiece, or a thing worth only to gamble, or a slave to use for fulfilling the lust, or property to be won through a war!!

Panchali waged a war on such atrocious outlook and tried her best to stand tall amidst this male unconquerable ego!


Awesome posts by you, Madhuri! 👏👏

624284 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

How are you all..Happy Lori for North Indian friends and Happy makar Sankranti for South friends

624284 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Sri Radha’s name is not mentioned directly in Srimad Bhagavatam because Sri Shuka Muni, being the topmost rasika bhakta, would enter nirvikalpa samadhi by just once hearing the divine name of Sri Radha. Such a state of unconscious bliss would last for many days. Parikshit Maharaj had just seven days before his death, thus Shuka Muni avoided directly uttering the name of Radha, and instead hinted about Her by the word “aradhana”.

In other Puranas the descriptions of Sri Radha are given directy, especially in Sri Brahma-vaivarta Purana. The circumstances involving the recitation of these Puranas did not limit Shuka Muni to seven days, and thus the Rishis of Naimisharanya were able to accomodate Sri Shuka Muni’s entering nirvikalpa samadhi.

For those who have a preset conception, it is useless to cite evidence as to the divinity of Sri Radha. Any text that has the name of Sri Radha within it will be disregarded in favour of one’s own opinion. One will conclude that such texts are either of recent time periods (without actually having any proof in this regards), or that the particular verses will be called as interpolation (again without having proof in this regards either).

As far as the rasa-lila, it occurred when Lord Krishna was eight years of age, but to the gopis the Lord appears as a youth of sixteen years old. The Lord manifests His form according to the desire of the devotee. We find in Srimad Bhagavatam a description of the rasa dance. There it is mentioned that it lasted for the period of one kalpa, which in our calculations would be millions of years. The activities of the omnipotent Lord are inconceivable and beyond mundane logic. For the Lord it is not difficult to manipulate time and space, for they are His energies. Lord Krishna also expanded into numerous forms during the rasa lila, as well as in Dwaraka. Such topics cannot be understood by one who tries to judge Krishna in terms of material history.

Those who accept Krishna as an ordinary person will naturally have difficulty in accepting His supernatural activities. Whether it be Krishna’s marrying 16,108 wives, or Krishna’s lifting of Govardhana hill, neither can be accomodated in terms of material experience.

All of the great bhakti schools in India accept the transcendental existence of Radha and Krishna. Some schools may not give special significance to these forms of the Lord, but they certainly accept such worship as authorized. Vishnuswami, Ramanuja, Vallabhacharya, and Chaitanya all accept the transcendental position of Sri Radha. Though some think the worship of Radha is of recent origins, this is not the case. It is true that in recent times the importance of Radha worship has been especially stressed by Sri Chaitanya, but it is interesting to note that the “radha kalyana” festival is most common in South India, where there is little influence of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu’s teachings. The madhurya-rasa (conjugal relationship with the Lord) is nothing new or sectarian. Great devotees such as Sri Andal have sung extensively about this madhurya-rasa.

Sutapasima thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Today's episode showed Ganesh stole maakhan prepared by Radha and he relished it


Vahana mushaka helped him reach it ... assisted secretly by Krishna himself .

very cute scene .


Edited by Sutapasima - 3 years ago
Viswasruti thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Now that Janmashtami and Ganesh Chaturthi, India's most popular festivals are fast approaching, is being celebrated with much pageantry, dedication, and fervour.

It means, now Radha is feeding Ganesha, leaving her family behind!

Edited by Viswasruti - 3 years ago
vyapti thumbnail
Anniversary 5 Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Now that Janmashtami and Ganesh Chaturthi, India's most popular festivals are fast approaching, is being celebrated with much pageantry, dedication, and fervour.

It means, now Radha is feeding Ganesha, leaving her family behind!

Her Family means? Krishna's family, Ayan's family or Vrishbhan's family?

Top