Angie now I believe we will never get answers to questions like why did Raj marry Sarita, why did Divya not contact Raj for 10 years, why did Sarita put up with abuse in varied forms? We are just supposed to assume that it happened and the story starts from here. Raj's reason about why he did not go after Divya (or at least contacted her) - that he was angry sounds very lame. The most important person in his life whom he loved dearly was going through such a big personal crisis, she lost her parents, her financial stability and had the responsibility of her siblings - at that moment all he could think of was that "he was angry at her". Does that even sound believable? Even a casual friend would have tried to help her or least understood her plight.@Misti, you are absolutely right about the abuse. He did stay silent for 10 years and his neglect/indifference is also a form of abuse. So that cannot be justified and so sympathy for him on that fact alone evaporates. But I still felt sorry for his young self (prior to marriage to Sarita) because he was no needy of someone like Divya. Waheeda Rehman (of Khamosi) is a good example. The way Raj was showing that desperation to Divya by showing how much he had missed her could be related to that character's breakdown in the end. It seemed as if all his suppressed emotions (of 10 years) came to surface. That's why I felt that sympathy for that ignoring everything else. But I still need to get explanation of this kind of desperation. Why so much hurt and anger when Divya did not marry anyone and only left him to take care of her family? He knows his family very well. A greedy family like that would have never tolerated Divya supporting her family while being a DIL of that house.
So it is not realistic that an outgoing open person (whom Divya knew) would transform into this kind of character if there is not some history there. I hope that creatives don't expect viewers to just blindly accept Raj's character the way he was and the way he is now.
You are also right about Sarita emotionally manipulating Divya and making her feel guilty of destroying Sarita's life even though she had nothing to do with Sarita's misery. Nobody can be responsible for somebody's bad behavior towards the other person. It is like Valmiki was told by Narad Muni that only he is responsible for all the crimes he has committed and his family - wife, parents and kids are not guilty of his sins. Divya did not get any space between coming to terms with her own feelings and Sarita marching in her life and bringing all that baggage of the past.
As for makers allowing anything - Sarita making a dignified choice, Raj coming out of his illusionary world and face the truth, all the past story logicially explaining characters etc., is a big question that only they can answer.Today I felt hopeful that a separation scene between the two would be show. There was a hint of something that happened between them 10 years ago. But then the hopes were dashed when Raj decided that all his complaints were gone once he saw Divya in his house. I am still reserving my judgment because this scene between Divya and Raj will continue tomorrow.But then Divya asked him the question (Did Raj feel anything for Sarita in 10 years?) where the audience know the answer even before the show started. But neglected to ask the question that audience have been demanding for four weeks: Why did Raj marry Sarita? That question was never asked. Then there is a vow of Divya to Sarita that she will never remind Raj of the past. So are creatives telling us to forget the past and concentrate on present?
comment:
p_commentcount