CV are busy promoting marriage to be a joke and affairs to be the norm of today and thats why they fail to ensure their characters are exploring their feeling and emotions and instead stick to giving baseless dialogues to the women and the family members! You are right we are all humans, and we do all commit mistakes, but a mistake can be forgiven as per its consequences, (per my belief) and the biggest mistaker has to be Raj, and instead of showing him the mirror the two ladies are acting like they will never get another man in their lives! anyways, the show is promoting nonsense! and i dont watch this based on loving one actor more, hence i want the marriage to be saved, only because 10 years was wasted in a woman's life in the belief that maybe one day, her husband will love her!
Innocent, why will they show that kind of emotions/feelings if they feel that it won't bring ratings. They only think mindless melodrama bring ratings. That's why screaming matches between Sarita and Kamla are shown every day. In the beginning, it was refreshing to see Sarita standing up for herself because typically this kind of DIL is not shown. But now it is just repetition. I would rather see emotions of leads and their actions. All actions of 3 characters (whether right or wrong) can still be explained very logically if the creatives want to do that because it is only one month and the story has not moved to an extent where it would be hard to do so.
I don't think they are going towards Divya and Raj wedding. That is the whole purpose to show Sundari that eventually Raj will be different from the father and Divya is different from Sundari. They are definitely going towards Raj and Sarita. That's why none of emotions of Divya and Raj are explored because they don't want viewers to root for this couple who have really good chemistry.
The norm of serials is to either show an ideal hero/husband or this obsessive destructive sort of hero who torments his other half (wife/lover). The wife/lover adores that person and takes all that abuse in the name of love and then reforms that person. Here he would be reformed by the help of his first love Divya. In PV1, it was obsession with the first wife (dead and perfect soulmate type love) and here in PV2, it is an obsession with first love (alive and perfect soulmate type). In both cases, the wedding was out of some source of force, but eventually it transformed the hero. Those kind of stories are fetching them good ratings and so this is the type of heros we will get in TV serials.
Of course, in all this all the issues will be ignored about characters. Raj had to have abandonment issues even before Divya left him. That's why her desertion of him (even for noble cause and him being aware of it) left such scars. They can easily contrast him with Gaurav who too was abandoned by his father but is emotionally secure. Maybe the mother is the key in all that because Raj has no functional parent and even Dadi is pretty screwed up character. They can also send a message that tolerating abuse for anyone (a husband or anybody else) is a waste of one's precious life. But I doubt they will do that. It would instead be shown that one's persistence can change/reform even a stone-hearted person, and hence it was good to tolerate all this abuse/neglect for 10 years.
They can show that people realize that memories of first love are more perfect than that love. Or that people change in 10 years and cannot go back to recapture the past, even though they are drawn towards it because it was so innocent and sweet. More than likely the last thing would be shown but in a convoluted serial type way.
So far I am highly unimpressed by the execution of this PH in how they are presenting characters. The story has potential, but the direction/execution/script needs major improvement. I don't have problems with actors because I have seen their previous work and know what they are capable of if given a good script. In this kind of script, even an actor like Naseeruddin Shah will not be able to do much.
Edited by Angie12 - 11 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount