Originally posted by: naq5
i think sindhu's situation is partly to be blamed on his mother also along with the way singhdant treated his son. She never tried to stop him when he hated prithvi . even when prithvi was on exile she was somewhere expecting that prithvi will not come back just because she was happy sindhu was being given a chance. somewhere i feel she did differentiate between her real son & adopted son. because if a mother will differentiate the child will also learn it. if prithvi was her biological eldest son would she have wished for sindhu too be given a chance at becoming king. NO
whereas singhdant was extra harsh on sindhu , never thought he was capable. but he was not wrong in making prithvi king which generally does go to the eldest child for him he did not differentiate because of blood he differentiated because of capability. i think if vatsa would have put her foot down & had she disapproved of sindhu's jealousy against prithvi strictly.
Vatsa was practical
and was a breath of fresh air
Neither did she hate her adopted son
Nor did she love him more than her son
that's what happens in real life
even among blood related siblings parents differentiate
here Sindhu was her own blood
She knew that her husband was biased
so she tried compensating it with her love
She also knew that Prithvi didn't want to be a king hence
she expected him to not come back
which she thought was a better solution to stop the sibling hatred
but when she saw that Sindhu wasn't able to handle the kingdom
when Prithvi was away, she didn't stop Prithvi from being a king
Vatsa should be the last person to be blamed for all this happenings
comment:
p_commentcount