Should Terrorist be prosecuted? - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

35

Views

3.9k

Users

18

Frequent Posters

mermaid_QT thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: SolidSnake

Terrorists are merely pawns in the BIG game, you can't stop terrorism by merely eliminating them, you'll have to hit at their Masters which are finanially and logistically supporting them, who train them, brainwash them, provide weapons. Unless you send a firm message that any terror attack will not go un-answered, their Masters won't stop promoting these terrorists. I am sick of listening "This incident will not affect the ongoing peace process", everytime a terror attack happens.




👏👏 well said deepak.

Terrorist = WOMD. hence no rights to terrorrists and no prosecution. slow and toturous death and body NOT returned either. I am amazed at how the so-called INTELLIGENCE fails to invade and abolish these TERRORIST TRAINING CELLS. children and adults obtaining training there should be captured and shown the videos of terrorits being tortured and killed. Terrorise the terrosrists.
Radiation therapy for cancer. Why prosecution for terrorists? They are one and the same. The former invaded a single life. The latter invades peaceful life of masses.
qwertyesque thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: sowmyaa

Terrorism, is the most dreadful and popular word heard, read, seen these days. Terrorists are growing in number everyday. I do not want to discuss any religion or terrorism/terrorist from particular religion. Terrorist no matter what name, cast, creed, country they come from they are Terrorist and they are there everywhere. So please don't take this topic to any religious discussion.

My question is should terrorist be prosecuted? I found attached link as one of the example as terrorist being tortured.http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/11/22/usint12079.htmMy question is…do you guys think terrorist should be prosecuted in world court specially made for terrorist or they should be shot on spot when caught, or tortured, or imprisoned without any trial. What do you guys think about it and please give your explanation about why you think that is the best policy to treat terrorist when caught. Now I am talking about world wide terrorism that affects other nation and NOT internal terror.

If its a confirmed terrorist there should be no prosecution, just execution. Prosecution is for crimes committed within a society. Terrorists dont fall in that category. since they dont belong to one. 😊

Edited by qwertyesque - 18 years ago
3365 thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#33
it should depend upon their motive for becoming a terrorist. there are some people who r being misguided,brainwashed so punishment should be given keeping that in mind
qwertyesque thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#34

Originally posted by: sandya_rao7

it should depend upon their motive for becoming a terrorist. there are some people who r being misguided,brainwashed so punishment should be given keeping that in mind

😆😆 If end justifies means.. lets all start doing crimes.. we have enough legit motives for that...😆

chatbuster thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

If its a confirmed terrorist there should be no prosecution, just execution. Prosecution is for crimes committed within a society. Terrorists dont fall in that category. since they dont belong to one. 😊

well said. except i'd do the encounter first. confirm later😉😆

Morning_Dew thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#36

Remind me something .
Three doctors were in the duck blind and a bird flew overhead.
The general practitioner looked at it and said, "Looks like a duck, flies like a duck... it's probably a duck," shooted at it but missed and the bird flew away.
The next bird flew overhead, and the pathologist looked at it, then looked through the pages of a bird manual, and said, "Hmmmm...green wings, yellow bill, quacking sound...might be a duck." He raised his gun to shootedvit, but the bird was long gone.

third bird flew over. The surgeon raised his gun and shooted almost without looking, brought the bird down, and turned to the pathologist and said, "Go see if that was a duck."




Edited by Morning_Dew - 18 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".