What makes Sana 'Characterless'?

791198 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#1
I've been reading a lot of posts on here that blatantly calls Sana Khan "characterless", "wh**e" (yes I saw this), ghaati (isn't this derogatory, correct me if I am wrong) and what not.

Now I want to know why.


On the one hand, we makes elaborate claims about stopping violence against women while on the other hand we call a woman characterless for a kiss on the cheek that she did not even initiate, not that there is anything characterless or wh**e-like about initiating it either. If this isn't hypocrisy, what is? How can you ask justice for women when you don't even practice what you preach?

What makes Sana a "characterless wh**e"? Does not every 20 something year old girl flirt, preen and smile to garner male attention? Girls in high schools, colleges, workplaces, everyone does it. It does not make you characterless nor does it mean you're a free-for-all.

What has she done on the show that warrants such vituperation? Has she walked around naked asking the men to sleep with her for money? No? Then sorry, she's not a wh**e because a wh**e is one that exchanges sex for money.


So, here's my lowdown on this shit. Like it or lump it.


To YOU and all those calling Sana characterless and a wh**e, I bet you are a woman too because mostly only women like to throw mud at other women for no freaking reason. And if you are a man partaking in this s**t shaming then a bigger shame on you. Sana has done NOTHING in the show that taints her character or warrants name calling of such kind. It is easy to protest and scream for women's rights when a heinous crime happens but very hard to practice what you preach. If you want people to respect women then start with it yourself. Charity begins at home.

There is no need to call a girl characterless just because she is 25, young and likes to flirt. Its called being young and enjoying your youth. Women flirt too, build a bridge and get over it or go back to your cave. We're not in the medieval times anymore. We don't have to act coy and wait for our knights in shining armors. We can pretend to play damsels in distress or a voluptuous vixen all we want and no that does not make us characterless or a wh**e! Men do it all the time! Why is no one throwing dirt at their character? Why? Because men doing it makes them studs but women automatically get relegated to the "characterless" slot? How does that make any iota of sense?


Quit the baseless s**t shaming!






Created

Last reply

Replies

413

Views

25.7k

Users

102

Likes

1.8k

Frequent Posters

return_to_hades thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#2
You say it girl. Sana is just like any other girl, you, me anyone on this forum. She flirts, she likes attention, she has her insecurities and her flaws. She also has her good aspects. She is not a goddess, but nor is she a wh**e. If you dislike her and disagree with her behavior, go ahead. But character assassination and stereotyping is uncalled for. Show some class and civilization!
vickyray95 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#3
Criticising a contestant should be done in a limit.
Criticism done in a bad taste , shows the CHARACTER of the criticiser.
LovesLowCulture thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#4
Well, I agree with the point you're trying to make, but I wouldn't go as far as to call this 's**t-shaming'
IMHO the term applies specifically to a North American context, while in India both men and women who have active libidos are shamed (ex. Rajev in the BB house).

Yes, the word characterless is being thrown around her rather carelessly. I think people need to differentiate between their disapproval/dislike of the way a contestant is portrayed rather than making such improper remarks about their personalities.

Regarding Sana, I don't think she's shown a lot of integrity in the house. I wouldn't call her "characterless" or even "fake" (everyone is fake in the house, imho). But nothing she does or says endears me to her either!
Chingaari thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Most Liked (February 2021) Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 13 years ago
#5
It is infact very classy trend here to say anything to Delu,Pillu and Sana rest all are Devi and Devta s
433796 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#6
Hey don't worry.. those who said Sana cahracterless were watching the mirror that time and just replace "I" with "Sana" here.
51559 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#7
Yes Agree she did not show any kinda cheapness..! But yes she does not deserves to be in Finals! Reason She is not a strong contestant !
Edited by Pentaminous. - 13 years ago
791198 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: BaleHead

Well, I agree with the point you're trying to make, but I wouldn't go as far as to call this 's**t-shaming'

IMHO the term applies specifically to a North American context, while in India both men and women who have active libidos are shamed (ex. Rajev in the BB house).

Yes, the word characterless is being thrown around her rather carelessly. I think people need to differentiate between their disapproval/dislike of the way a contestant is portrayed rather than making such improper remarks about their personalities.

Regarding Sana, I don't think she's shown a lot of integrity in the house. I wouldn't call her "characterless" or even "fake" (everyone is fake in the house, imho). But nothing she does or says endears me to her either!



And I am a North American viewer so to me this very well fits the category of s**t shaming. Chuck it up to the concept of cultural relativism.

You don't have to like her or find her endearing, you have a right to your likes and dislikes. But there is no need to call a girl characterless or a wh**e. It is disturbing and extremely uncalled for.
605921 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#9
thnx for this post 👍🏼
Sarkar thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#10
I Never said or liked when Sana was called characterless.she has not done any thing that she should be called that.
But looking at the Episodes I must say she is not Naive either she very well knows what she is doing .she wants to flirt fine, she wants attention no harm all girls at their 20's are like this only.
She must confront people (housemates) when she is questioned about her link ups with mens inside with all dignity and respect that she herself has never had any such thing in mind it's just plain friendship.
Bhaktiyaar came, Delu's mom came and both linked her to Rajeev ,when she is Just 25 and is it o.k if she is spending around late night hours with a 40+ man in name of "I enjoy flirting" or "we are Just good friends".(I don't buy this).
If people are charging her she knows it very well from where fume is coming and she should have backed off long back with Rajeev.
I repeat again she has not done any thing that should categorize her in genre of "Characterless" but she is not Innocent either.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".