Originally posted by: LifeOLicious
<br><br>I doubt people think it is unbiased! People will complain less if the awards are given to deserving people......most of the awards going to 3 Idiots and Kaminey getting sidelined doesn't seem like it is unbiased! But since 3 Idiots was an all time blockbuster and most people loved the movie for it's content...most people will not complain. Now if instead of 3 Idiots let's say New York walked away with awards....then I can see many complaining! Even if Kaminey walked off with a lot of awards people will not complain as much....people don't mind the bias when deserving people get awards ....people complain about the bias when undeserving people get awards.....that's what I think...favoritism can play a part to some extent in this whole awards are biased business....but seriously if your favorite gets rewarded for undeserving stuff I think the fans would complain!<br>
Lifeolicious, I agree to an extend. Still let me ask you..who are deserving people? To every 2 likes we will find 4 dislikes. A jury nominates according to their choice and many agree and disagree. Similarly, when the winners are announced we agree with some and disagree with some.
If a movie is a blockbuster and it is not a "classic" then people say oh! these days crap becomes hit. Horrible and whatnot. The fact is that majority loved it and it became a hit. Does it make it deserving? May be to the ones who liked it but to others it is not.
If you read 3 Idiots review outside IF then majority rated it mediocre. Does that change the fact that it is a blockbuster? So if you say that it is deserving then there are several who find it undeserving.
People are going to complain no matter what. Some complains genuinely but most are because their favorite wasn't nominated or won an award. Then there are some who complain to spite others.
Jury is just a bunch of people. Nominations/Winners are their opinion and it is always going to be biased. I have never seen any award winners list when people have not complained.
4