Why is it that the same people who are always ready to say that Ruhi is the way she is because of Abhimanyu are the same people that don’t want to say that Abhir is the way he is because of Abhinav? I mean, if one is the way she is because of the man who brought her up as a kid then the same should also hold true for the other right? But no…in Abhir’s case it’s because of his blood so why not Ruhi?
Ruhi is the daughter of Aarohi and Neil. Neil was only Abhimanyu’s half brother. Why not blame the Goenka blood line with the way both Ruhi’s and Abhir’s mothers were? I mean one sister started living with a stranger right after her divorce and then was ready to marry her ex that she professed to hate within a short time after the death of her supposed ‘true love’. The other sister… well the less said the better with everything that she did.
So, a certain someone’s fans, please pick a lane and stick to it instead of flip flopping depending on the situation. If Ruhi is the way she is because of the man who brought her up then Abhir is most definitely the way he is because of his mahanta ka murat foster father who committed paternity fraud!


