WDT #9: Why didn't Hanuman save Mata Sita by defeating Ravana himself? - Page 2

मुझे भी आगे से tag किया करो कोई प्लीज.

मुखे भी ये mythological topics अच्छे लगते है.

As many of u have answered, it was pre written..Ki ravan ka vadh/mrutyu ram (matlab sampoorna purush) k hatho hi hone wali hai.

That's why hanuman , jab ki wo capable the ravan ko maarne ke liye, lekin unhone aisa nahi kiya.

Also, ram k pavan charan Lanka ko kaise lagte agar hanuman ji ye sab kaam karte ?

Ram k pavitra charan ke vajeh se hi Lanka ka udhhar hua aage jaake.

Kyun ki bibhishan, jo k sachhai aur dharm k marg pe chalta tha, wo raja bana lanka kaa(ravan k baad). 

To automatically, uske under Lanka ka rajya bhi achha hi chala hoga.

Hanuman Chalisa in one minute 🙏

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4scs8kSE4j/?igsh=MW1vZDc3N2lsYXpqOA==

Because Sita said she wanted to be rescued by Sri Ram only.

Hanuman  Did Offer To Rescue Mata Sita But She Didn't Go With Him.

Because Ravan. Had To Be Killed By Ram That's Why She Didn't Go With Him

Hanuman was revered as a Maha Jnani, a wise man with intellect. He was so overjoyed when he found Sita, that he wanted to get her and Rama together as soon as possible.

He offered Sita a solution for this, but she refused his offer because she was the most self-assured and knowledgeable woman and insisted that her husband must punish her abductor and free her from captivity.  

Sita was very clear about her choice when Hanuman offered her help to escape from Ravan's captivity.  

Her desire was to be released with dignity and with respect. That is why, rather than fleeing from Lanka, she chooses to await the arrival of Rama. 

Except for being carried by force by Ravana, she was a devoted wife who never let any man touch her. Hence, she graciously declined Hanuman's modest request to accompany him on his return journey to Kishkindha where Rama and the Vanara Sena were waiting for the good news of her whereabouts. 

Hanuman respectfully accepted Sita’s decision.  Her husband's retaliation for the disgrace was the only way she wanted her pain to end.  

Sita, as a pious woman, cannot run away with a stranger. She was fully aware of the fact that such an escape would raise questions about her character in society.  Sita wanted her Ram, a leader and role model at the time, to resolve the abduction issue in the most straightforward way possible, confront and defeat the offender. She didn't want anyone to doubt his ability to reclaim his wife's affection by sitting idle. Hanuman was well aware of this.  

Hanuman's primary mission was as a messenger he had to search her and inform her whereabouts to Rama. He was there to inform Sita that Rama was there for her, to teach Ravan a lesson before engaging in a full-fledged battle. As a messenger, he was not authorized to engage in combat or arrange an escape.   

We must regard Rama and Sita as king and queen of a nation. That means their character must be above par. People in a developed society hold their leaders to a high moral standard.  Sita's refusal to go with Hanuman, as well as Rama's testing Sita by fire, demonstrate the high standard they put for themselves as a ruler and the queen of their country.

The Ramayana and Mahabharata are practical treatises about family relationships and leadership qualities of that time. 

There is chaupaai  in sundar kand in ramcharitra  Manas where Hanuman  said to seeta

Abhhain maatu Mai jaaon lawaai

Prabhu  aaysu nahi raam duhaai 

Matlab  main  aapko  ko abhi  yahan  se utha ke lekar jaa sakta hoon par raam ki aagya nahi hai isliye khuch din aur dheeraj rakhiye 

Now lets go more back 

There was Jai Vijay  dwarpaal who refuse to let enter 5 sanatkumar in vishnu  dhaam

So 5 Samant  kumar curse   hai Vijay  to rebirth as rakshas  three  times on earth ie   hirankashyap and hirankashya on satyug then   raavan and kumbh karan in treta and shishupsl and dantvakra in dwapar.

.Jai Vijay  apologise  abd solution  of curses  was that lord vishnu  ke avatar se jub Jai Vijay  ka udhar hoga tabhi  Jai  Vijay wapas lord vishnu  dharm aayenge 

As it was already  decided  according  to Jai Vijay  incident  that raavam ka udhas lord vishnu  ke avatar  raam  se hona tha not by Hanuman  that is why it is only  lord vishnu  avatar  that is  lord raam  kill  ravan  

Moreover   according  to raam  charita Manas when  lord Narada give   curses lord raam  u have to bear separation  from ur wife then  monkey will help u in searching  seeta  narsad nowhere  Said monkey will  kill ravan  that is role of Hanuman  to search seeta not to kill ravan  .

And more over  lord raam ka dharti pe  avatar  lene ka main purpose yahi  tha to kill ravan that is why ravan  kill by raam not by Hanuman  

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

 

Hanuman was revered as a Maha Jnani, a wise man with intellect. He was so overjoyed when he found Sita, that he wanted to get her and Rama together as soon as possible.

He offered Sita a solution for this, but she refused his offer because she was the most self-assured and knowledgeable woman and insisted that her husband must punish her abductor and free her from captivity.  

Sita was very clear about her choice when Hanuman offered her help to escape from Ravan's captivity.  

Her desire was to be released with dignity and with respect. That is why, rather than fleeing from Lanka, she chooses to await the arrival of Rama. 

Except for being carried by force by Ravana, she was a devoted wife who never let any man touch her. Hence, she graciously declined Hanuman's modest request to accompany him on his return journey to Kishkindha where Rama and the Vanara Sena were waiting for the good news of her whereabouts. 

Hanuman respectfully accepted Sita’s decision.  Her husband's retaliation for the disgrace was the only way she wanted her pain to end.  

Sita, as a pious woman, cannot run away with a stranger. She was fully aware of the fact that such an escape would raise questions about her character in society.  Sita wanted her Ram, a leader and role model at the time, to resolve the abduction issue in the most straightforward way possible, confront and defeat the offender. She didn't want anyone to doubt his ability to reclaim his wife's affection by sitting idle. Hanuman was well aware of this.  

Hanuman's primary mission was as a messenger he had to search her and inform her whereabouts to Rama. He was there to inform Sita that Rama was there for her, to teach Ravan a lesson before engaging in a full-fledged battle. As a messenger, he was not authorized to engage in combat or arrange an escape.   

We must regard Rama and Sita as king and queen of a nation. That means their character must be above par. People in a developed society hold their leaders to a high moral standard.  Sita's refusal to go with Hanuman, as well as Rama's testing Sita by fire, demonstrate the high standard they put for themselves as a ruler and the queen of their country.

The Ramayana and Mahabharata are practical treatises about family relationships and leadership qualities of that time. 

Loved Your Detailed Explanation Madhu

Completely agree with the narrative on Devi Sita and Shri Hanuman, and the greater purpose of Shri Ram too. In addition to what has been presented here, if we give it a deeper thought, we know that Shri Hanuman is revered to as a roop of Mahadev across India. As Dashanan was a devout shivbhakt, it would also have been unfair for Shiv's avatar to kill him, and it would set the wrong example. Though it is interesting to note that as a messenger, Mahadev in the guise of Shri Hanuman did issue enough warnings to Ravan to do what was right and guide him towards his moksh differently if he so chose to do so, but he did not heed to anything in his ghamand, and thus suffered the consequences.