Can we not celebrate Animal.- Page 24

^^ This.

Originally posted by: loginidran

Coming to the main topic, yes I agree with the TM. No movie that involves bigotry of any kind or glorification of animalistic tendencies should be supported nor justified. If you are curious or want to just watch it for whatever it’s worth to you, nobody is stopping you but stop justifying the director or the actor by dragging irrelevant movie clips from decades old movies.

Originally posted by: Nishita123

Not sure but in my recent memory - definitely those who don’t have any issue mocking female actors for their personal lives / wedding / pregnancy - are finding issue with this movie 🤷‍♀️

Can’t take them seriously at all.

Dho daala...

Originally posted by: FatalFlaw

Nobody really takes these fanatics seriously, not even themselves, LOL. Sure, there's a conversation happening, and activists are speaking up, which is great – there should be healthy dialogues about the dangers of movies like Animal. But the fanatics on this forum are just opportunists. Their frustration and anger seem to stem not from the violence and misogyny in the movie, but rather because their favorites didn't star in it.

Seriously......I was told yesterday .....that when a woman gets raped....I should rejoice Bira's acting.....like WTF??.....Like WT actual F???.....If in real life someone would have told me this......I would have taken them to the cleaners to get their dirty mind cleaned....but this is a forum and there is only so much one can say....

Originally posted by: Nishita123

Not sure but in my recent memory - definitely those who don’t have any issue mocking those actors for their personal lives / wedding / pregnancy - are finding issue with this movie 🤷‍♀️

Can’t take them seriously at all.

True.

Most members are hypocrites here irrespective of the fanbase. And jealous of other stars successes. Not all but most. Off course they will deny. But something similar comes up for their favourites they will keep quite and let it pass 😂

OT yet to see the movie. From the trailer it looked like about father-son relationship and lot of violence. Violent movie should not be a problem. But given his history Vanga certainly can put some scenes to trigger certain sections of audience/critics but hard to believe that could be the main theme of the movie and not the father/son and revenge/violence story arc.

Originally posted by: Beautyful_Mess

I would advise Ranveer fans to stop it here this person is desperate to take the heat off of Animal and turning the topic RK vs Veera is doing exactly that. Let them be desperate and find other ways to defend this misogynistic women degrading film. Let’s stop providing the relieve that they are evidently so desperate for. Thank you for coming to my Ted talk.

That person tagged me in their first post mentioning ranveer, obviously to try and get a reaction out of me, I didnt even bother responding to them coz I knew what they were trying to do.

Originally posted by: TheDarkRock

...OT yet to see the movie. From the trailer it looked like about father-son relationship and lot of violence. Violent movie should not be a problem. But given his history Vanga certainly can put some scenes to trigger certain sections of audience/critics but hard to believe that could be the main theme of the movie and not the father/son and revenge/violence story arc.

It had been similar to me...I even imagined a possible story...

Generally, I wouldn't have objected to the director to trigger reactions as I've nothing against provocation as such...it's the motivationwhich is important to me.

Now, what I get through reading (and my watching of his debut movie Arjun Reddy):

Imo, Vanga betrayed and deliberately mislead the audience. He promised a father-son story but failed to make it relatable throughout the movie. He used hyped forms of violence - without distancing himself (e.g. the use of a huge machine gun - good as an exaggerated phallus symbol - had been taken serious). The protagonist's tendency for overkill had been used to make him a deranged psychpath but this person's portray wasn't comprehensible. Instead he was designed as someone invincible dealing in a so-called Alpha-male-way with severe health issues, marital issues, enemy issues - without all this being grounded in a coherent story.

At least the 2nd half was for show...violence for show, sexism for show, wasting a good co-actor and a good co-actress ...for show...an almost two-hours-long director-ego-trip.

Vanga didn't make a movie for the audience, he made a movie to dupe the audience laughing all the way to the bank.

To me, that is reason enough to support nothing that has to do with the movie...it hadn't been made to entertain an audience...it is Vanga's personal revenge at the expense of the audience.

Ranbir wanted to do a movie with Vanga and for Vanga, he became the perfect 'means to an end'...not more because he didn't give Ranbir a well-done story and/or character arc like he did with Arjun Reddy.

Originally posted by: I_M_SultaN

just throw tomatoes or laugh react life maza ni

Animal's story itself is worth throwing tomatoes at.

https://twitter.com/basedIITian/status/1731312650561425687#m

^^ Leaving aside Kangana's issues she is right in above clip.

Originally posted by: Petrichor80

https://twitter.com/basedIITian/status/1731312650561425687#m

^^ Leaving aside Kangana's issues she is right in above clip.

Before losing her shiz, she was right about lots of things. This is one of them.