Ban lifted on Pakistani artists: Fawad, Mahira can work in India now - Page 14

Originally posted by: Funtuss

People talk about secularism, peace, forgiveness, freedom of expression, bhaichara and all that jazz to sound woke and liberal. But their actions are exactly opposite.

I dont think you deserved to be blocked for making one single comment about paki actors. Even pakistanis themselves wouldnt be so offended iykwim?

Sara kuch "likes" paane ke chakkar mein likhte hai. They want certain types to rally behind them to keep them relevant after losing their credibility completely.. hence the overreaction

Who cares anyway. Accha hua block kar diya.

And India is secular for her own people. Indian constitution is to protect Indian people, not jehadi terrorists. India has no obligation to be secular towards pakis. If they expect same privileges as Indians, then somewhere in their minds they want to be Indian. They regret partition. They wish they could undo 14th August

Originally posted by: NotYourType

Who cares anyway. Accha hua block kar diya.

And India is secular for her own people. Indian constitution is to protect Indian people, not jehadi terrorists. India has no obligation to be secular towards pakis. If they expect same privileges as Indians, then somewhere in their minds they want to be Indian. They regret partition. They wish they could undo 14th August

Nahi re...indian constitution ke hisab se hi hame pakiyo ko bhi equal treatment, respect, bijli,pani, ration, employment, opportunities vagera dena padega warna log kahenge humare common sense mein locha hai

Originally posted by: Funtuss

Lol, tumne bhi apne signature mein disclaimer daal dena tha ... "i am a muslim women and i am unequivically AGAINST islamic fundamintalists and terrorists"

Uske baad aaram se anti paki commnet karti to sound a little credible jn your criticism.

Ab bhugto.

Waise khala ji se zara sa bhi contrarian view bardasht nahi hota. Woh ya toh ban karwabe ki dhamkiya deti hai ya ohir immediately block kar deti hai. Mere ko bhi blovk mara hai

Par maze ki baat yeh hai ki block marne ke baad bhi she kept talking about me and kept cisiting my thread

Ek aur hai piya something in this thread. I only quoted her once and she blocked me immediately adter calling me jobless

These are the people who want us to show bhaichara to pakistanis after they carried out terririst attacks in our country

This is why you keep getting banned. For a newbie, you have a knack for creating IDs just to take potshots at members.

Pray tell how do you as a newbie know RTH was a moderator 10 years ago?

Minionite please review this “newbie” posts and do the needful. All he does is go around attacking people in irrelevant threads.

Originally posted by: NotYourType

@Meri pyari Khala Ji aka Supar_khala -

I cannot tag you! Have you blocked me? Ab aisa maine kya kar diya?

I implore you to unblock me! If you want India to unblock Paki actors, I can surely be audacious enough to ask you this favour, no? It's the same principle? Bhaichara...peace...

BTW I really wanted to ask why you laughed so heartily at my previous post Tell me what's so funny - expecting self respect from paki actors or expecting them to be good humans? Eagerly waiting for your answer. Please unblock me na...we can have so much fun

Honey, you cannot tag me because my tags are off for everyone. Basically, no one can tag me.

Hate to break it to you but you are nothing special. I don’t even notice your posts except for the funny anti-Muslim/Pakistani post you just made. Hence the laugh reaction. Cope

Originally posted by: Supari_khala

Honey, you cannot tag me because my tags are off for everyone. Basically, no one can tag me.

Hate to break it to you but you are nothing special. I don’t even notice your posts except for the funny anti-Muslim/Pakistani post you just made. Hence the laugh reaction. Cope

Lol..it took you some time to 'cope' with my harmless post. Koi baat nahi. Waise you need to improve your own coping mechanism. Itna fragile ego accha nahi

And glad to know no one can tag you and it's not just me. I felt I was too important to be singled out like this but you cleared my confusion. Thanks!

One a side note, I am not your 'honey' so don't take that patronising tone with me again. See you around, Khala

Originally posted by: NotYourType

Lol..it took you some time to 'cope' with my harmless post. Koi baat nahi. Waise you need to improve your own coping mechanism. Itna fragile ego accha nahi

And glad to know no one can tag you and it's not just me. I felt I was too important to be singled out like this but you cleared my confusion. Thanks!

One a side note, I am not your 'honey' so don't take that patronising tone with me again. See you around, Khala

I don’t stay around 24/7 on this forum. Some of us have a life outside of it. Unlike the bigots whose life is centered around creating MIDs and “newbie” IDs just to attack Muslims and Pakistani members. Hence, the delay in response.

Oh and FYI honey, if I had blocked you, you wouldn’t be able to react to my posts nor would I be able to react to your posts. Keep that in mind next time you accuse someone with some harebrained accusation. Capiche?

Toodles.

Originally posted by: Supari_khala

I don’t stay around 24/7 on this forum. Some of us have a life outside of it. Unlike the bigots whose life is centered around creating MIDs and “newbie” IDs just to attack Muslims and Pakistani members. Hence, the delay in response.

Oh and FYI honey, if I had blocked you, you wouldn’t be able to react to my posts nor would I be able to react to your posts. Keep that in mind next time you accuse someone with some harebrained accusation. Capiche?

Toodles.

We are sooo alike! I too come once in a while so don’t know how tagging works. Thanks for enlightening me.
However I don’t understand why you would disable tagging as you are not around the forum 24*7 anyway. May be it’s one of your coping mechanisms besides name calling and derogatory language. I’ll just give you benefit of doubt this time…Cheerio!!

Originally posted by: Funtuss

Wow. What intelligent retort. You were moderating this forum once upon a time i heard?

I moderated Debate Mansion. But you wouldn't understand it.

Originally posted by: Funtuss

@bold....So by that logic i suppose islamic republics have absolutely no common sense to treat their civillians from different religions with equality?

Theocracies are uncommon and offer favorable treatment of adherents to the state religion. I personally, am grateful to not be born in a theocracy. I like my church and state separate.

Originally posted by: Funtuss

In that sense, people from such countries should have no issues if they are not treated equally by outsiders?

Theocracies favor the state religion.

Secular nations treat everyone equally. So yes, people of all religions should expect to be treated fairly. Why are you so intent on making a secular nation behave like a theocracy?

Originally posted by: Funtuss

Also does your common sense also allow us as a secular nation to employ and enrich people who silently suppprt terrorism eminating from their own country?

I am not a fan of celebrity silence. But silence is not support. If we are to take silence as support then we would have to ensure that each and every person whom we support releases a statement condemning issues that matter and that would be tedious.

So the simple rule of thumb is to assume the best intent, treat people fairly, and not shun them until there is irrevocable proof that they support wrongdoing.

Originally posted by: Funtuss

If we cant not even expect from them a few sympathetic words for the lives lost in the terrorist attacks, how can you expect us to give them the plateform to work n earn name fame and money?

Where is the common sense to expect them paki actors to be treatted respectfully by indians?

Very rich expectations to point fingers at citizens of theocracies who do not have free expression when the supreme leader of India doesn't even utter a word of sympathy for victims of communal violence in the nation he is supposed to govern and steward.

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

I moderated Debate Mansion. But you wouldn't understand it.

Theocracies are uncommon and offer favorable treatment of adherents to the state religion. I personally, am grateful to not be born in a theocracy. I like my church and state separate.

Theocracies favor the state religion.

Secular nations treat everyone equally. So yes, people of all religions should expect to be treated fairly. Why are you so intent on making a secular nation behave like a theocracy?

I am not a fan of celebrity silence. But silence is not support. If we are to take silence as support then we would have to ensure that each and every person whom we support releases a statement condemning issues that matter and that would be tedious.

So the simple rule of thumb is to assume the best intent, treat people fairly, and not shun them until there is irrevocable proof that they support wrongdoing.

Very rich expectations to point fingers at citizens of theocracies who do not have free expression when the supreme leader of India doesn't even utter a word of sympathy for victims of communal violence in the nation he is supposed to govern and steward.

Why no other religion in Pakistan cricket team or in any other field --over there

Very very simple quetion Do you understand this ???

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

Where in the constitution does it state that India does it state that India has to mistreat Pakistanis either?

It's common sense. As a secular nation, we treat civilians equitably, irrespective of their religion.

I see