Originally posted by: Neutral2
It will be the same justification which most people give in defence of Viaan.
She will say she didn't tell the reason of asking big amount 1 cr and he was raised thinking all woman are gold digger so it is fine to ask for ONS.
I am thinking how much this Justification valid. The company policy was such that Katha had to lie about her marital status. Surely 1 cr is huge amount. But did it give right to Viaan to ask for ONS to his employee instead of knowing reason.
Let's say a girl is roaming alone at midnight, wearing short skirt and little drunk and book cab. Cab driver thought such girl are loose character and it is OK to wrongly touch her and kiss her. How much this justifications goes.
I just hope it isn't a justification. Because there is just no justification and makers are aware of this that's why, at any point, they didn't whitewash what he did. But, don't know how will they cover the progress of 200 episodes in one episode in one standoff.
Either it will go along the way, the person Viaan is now, is not the same person she met in that hotel room. Or it can go along the lines, she was the one wronged so, Viaan is answerable to her only and, she acknowledges what he did is a sin, but, he redeemed himself.
The way they execute this will be detrimental to this show's moral grounds. Already, many people are mad over this.
