Katha Ankahee -- #15 daily EDT - Page 43

Originally posted by: _OrChiD_

So glad they didn't play hide and seek separation, Katha broke up directly with patient, didn't hide behind bandage

Now hero can manofying his heroine as he is feet too with a lot of anger for massi, waisey toh I like this type of romance. No marriage , no dusrey city ki separation, everything is on point, shadi ki bathhh matt karna phir sey bhai

In today's episode, It felt like Katha is asking all the questions which viewers had been asking for since ages - What is the thought process of Maya?

Aditi's acting is the only saving grace of the episode.Katha after all the questioning and badi baatein of not leaving Viaan will eventually leave him.Maya's character is just.Bas bhi karo! I think this is the last track of the show and it will probably end by Nov making way for the new show.I would want it to.Doesn't have anything to offer.Another thing I didn't like was Katha telling what Viaan did is not a sin.It was definitely wrong.

It was back and forth gaslighting between Katha and Maya. I am satisfied to say the least. Was expecting something like this.

Aditi's acting is always top notch

I don't know what she meant by "agar kisi ko lagta hai maine ya Viaan ne kuch galat kiya hai toh wo unke nazariye ki dikkat hogi". Galat toh kiya hai Viaan ne. But, what she meant by galat, lets see....

Originally posted by: abca19510

It was back and forth gaslighting between Katha and Maya. I am satisfied to say the least. Was expecting something like this.

Aditi's acting is always top notch

I don't know what she meant by "agar kisi ko lagta hai maine ya Viaan ne kuch galat kiya hai toh wo unke nazariye ki dikkat hogi". Galat toh kiya hai Viaan ne. But, what she meant by galat, lets see....

I think I understood that line but can't explain. It felt like it was between 2 adult, she understood his pov later, now it doesn't scare her something like that. She did as it was her need, he did because he wanted to be wrong from 1 women whom he thought different. Minus minus plus something like that. I don't know what I even writing!!

Watching a daily soap really hard, spent 20 minutes on 1 scene and that scene hasn't completed yet

Originally posted by: _OrChiD_

I think I understood that line but can't explain. It felt like it was between 2 adult, she understood his pov later, now it doesn't scare her something like that. She did as it was her need, he did because he wanted to be wrong from 1 women whom he thought different. Minus minus plus something like that. I don't know what I even writing!!

I was thinking something similar along these lines only. But, lets see what justification she gives for Viaan's action to anyone. Although, she said she is answerable to herself only.

Originally posted by: abca19510

I was thinking something similar along these lines only. But, lets see what justification she gives for Viaan's action to anyone. Although, she said she is answerable to herself only.

Originally posted by: _OrChiD_

I think I understood that line but can't explain. It felt like it was between 2 adult, she understood his pov later, now it doesn't scare her something like that. She did as it was her need, he did because he wanted to be wrong from 1 women whom he thought different. Minus minus plus something like that. I don't know what I even writing!!

It will be the same justification which most people give in defence of Viaan.

She will say she didn't tell the reason of asking big amount 1 cr and he was raised thinking all woman are gold digger so it is fine to ask for ONS.

I am thinking how much this Justification valid. The company policy was such that Katha had to lie about her marital status. Surely 1 cr is huge amount. But did it give right to Viaan to ask for ONS to his employee instead of knowing reason.

Let's say a girl is roaming alone at midnight, wearing short skirt and little drunk and book cab. Cab driver thought such girl are loose character and it is OK to wrongly touch her and kiss her. How much this justifications goes.

Originally posted by: Neutral2

It will be the same justification which most people give in defence of Viaan.

She will say she didn't tell the reason of asking big amount 1 cr and he was raised thinking all woman are gold digger so it is fine to ask for ONS.

I am thinking how much this Justification valid. The company policy was such that Katha had to lie about her marital status. Surely 1 cr is huge amount. But did it give right to Viaan to ask for ONS to his employee instead of knowing reason.

Let's say a girl is roaming alone at midnight, wearing short skirt and little drunk and book cab. Cab driver thought such girl are loose character and it is OK to wrongly touch her and kiss her. How much this justifications goes.

So, you think Viaan would ask any XYZ girl whoever asks for favor. I am sure a lot of girl hit on him for his bank balance, intelligence, of course for his smile though and he did help a lot of girl too as he is enough rich but he dared with only Katha.

If he was that kind of man, then Shamita wouldn't be fired.

POV difference is here, I think he asked for that night because he was already in love and when she asked for money that made him go haywire.

I am not justifying his action, he was wrong, will always be for that night. At least Viaan doesn't deserve to be compared with Cab drivers who checks on every girl.