if Angad is abuser bad etc etc then sahiba look more worse because why sahiba with that abusive bad person with almost one year 🤷♀️for what reason?Originally posted by: Bollyfan44
Angad is the golden child in the Brar Mansion and in this forum. Apparently, his character can do no wrong. Even he defends the great Manveer’s wrongdoings, so why is it wrong Sahiba goes along with her family. I am not saying it is right to defend wrong at all, but Angad’s character has been completely whitewashed from the beginning of the serial. He was not completely likeable. They have improved his character but there are still flaws. Despite the flaws I have grown to like his character. It is improving, but he is not the golden the child this forum portrays him to be. Sahiba going along with her family to get Seerat in the Brar mansion trumps the abusive behavior the family continuously commits towards her. Seerat is not privy to same abusive treatment in the house even though she committed a much bigger fault. What double standard? Angad, can never be wrong because Sahiba committed fraud, held onto secrets. Angad is is right because he was duped, lied to manipulated, heartbroken, he apologized for his guilt, he apologized for his accusations, he apologized for almost forcing himself on a woman, man handling, and force feeding, etc. He is definitely a golden child and Sahiba belongs with the rest of the villains. Her character has flaws, but not to the extent where such bashing is deserved. The writers deserve this honor. If she were so horrible she would have them all arrested except for Veer, Gurleen, and Veer’s dad.
) and it doesn't suit Angad's characterization. Or else the writers should have explicitly shown Angad to be still in love with Seerat, then maybe I would have sided with Angad a bit. Because its love and he was forced into an unwanted marriage...then fine. yeh toh aisa nahi hein.